Pharmaceuticalization of Society in Context: Theoretical, Empirical and Health Dimensions

被引:232
作者
Abraham, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Dept Sociol, Sch Law Polit & Sociol, Brighton BN1 9SN, E Sussex, England
来源
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION | 2010年 / 44卷 / 04期
关键词
biomedicalism; consumerism; drug innovation; marketing; medicalization; pharmaceutical industry; regulatory state; REGULATORY STATE; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; ATTENTION; INDUSTRY; SOCIOLOGY; POLITICS; CHALLENGES; INNOVATION; DIAGNOSIS; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1177/0038038510369368
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Sociological interest in pharmaceuticals has intensified, heightening awareness of 'pharmaceuticalization'. It is argued that pharmaceuticalization should be understood by reference to five main biosociological explanatory factors: biomedicalism, medicalization, pharmaceutical industry promotion and marketing, consumerism, and regulatory-state ideology or policy. The biomedicalism thesis, which claims that expansion of drug treatment reflects advances in biomedical science to meet health needs, is found to be a weak explanatory factor because a significant amount of growth in pharmaceuticalization is inconsistent with scientific evidence, and because drug innovations offering significant therapeutic advance have been declining across the sector, including areas of major health need. Some elements of consumerism have undermined pharmaceuticalization, even causing de-pharmaceuticalization in some therapeutic sub-fields. However, other aspects of consumerism, together with industry promotion, medicalization, and deregulatory state policies are found to be drivers of increased pharmaceuticalization in ways that are largely outside, or suboptimal for, significant therapeutic advances in the interests of public health.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 622
页数:20
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]   Progress, innovation and regulatory science in drug development: The politics of international standard-setting [J].
Abraham, J ;
Reed, T .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2002, 32 (03) :337-369
[2]   Transnational industrial power, the medical profession and the regulatory state: adverse drug reactions and the crisis over the safety of Halcion in the Netherlands and the UK [J].
Abraham, J .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2002, 55 (09) :1671-1690
[3]   Citizenship, medical expertise and the capitalist regulatory state in Europe [J].
Abraham, J ;
Lewis, G .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 36 (01) :67-88
[5]   BIAS IN SCIENCE AND MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE - THE OPREN CONTROVERSY [J].
ABRAHAM, J .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 28 (03) :717-736
[7]   International comparative analysis and explanation in medical sociology: Deimystifying the halcion anomaly [J].
Abraham, J ;
Sheppard, J .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 32 (01) :141-162
[8]  
Abraham J., 1995, SCI POLITICS PHARM I
[9]  
ABRAHAM J, 2002, BRIT SOC ASS C YORK
[10]  
Abraham J., 2000, Regulating medicines in Europe: Competition, experts and public health