A Quality, Benefit, Cost, and Financial Framework for Health Information Technology, E-Prescribing: A Delphi Study

被引:3
作者
Demuro, Paul R. [1 ]
Ash, Joan [2 ]
Middleton, Blackford [3 ]
Fletcher, Justin [4 ]
Madison, Cecelia J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Broad & Cassel LLP, Orlando, FL 32801 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Informat & Clin Epidemiol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Apervita Inc, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA USA
[5] Calif State Univ Chico, Sch Nursing, Chico, CA 95929 USA
来源
CONTEXT SENSITIVE HEALTH INFORMATICS: REDESIGNING HEALTHCARE WORK | 2017年 / 241卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Health information technology; e-prescribing; Delphi method; frameworks; stakeholders; informatics; quality; managed care; care teams; RECORDS; CARE;
D O I
10.3233/978-1-61499-794-8-69
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Little research has been conducted about the quality, benefits, costs, and financial considerations associated with health information technology (HIT), particularly informatics technologies, such as e-prescribing, from the perspective of all its stakeholders. Objectives. This research effort sought to identify the stakeholders involved in e-prescribing and to identify and rank-order the positives and the negatives from the perspective of the stakeholders to create a framework to assist in the development of incentives and payment mechanisms which result in better managed care. Methods. The Delphi method was employed by enlisting a panel of experts. They were presented with the results of initial research in an online survey of questions which sought to prioritize the quality, benefit, cost, and financial effects of e-prescribing from the perspective of each stakeholder. From the results of this study, a framework was presented to framework experts. Results. The experts added stakeholders and positives and negatives to the initial lists and rank-ordered the positives and negatives of e-prescribing from the perspective of each stakeholder. The aggregate results were summarized by category of stakeholder. The framework experts evaluated the framework. Conclusions. Positives and negatives can be rank-ordered from the perspective of each stakeholder. A useful framework was created.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 75
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Adler-Milstein J., RETURN IINFORMATION
[2]   Accuracy of Pharmacy Benefit Manager Medication Formularies in an Electronic Health Record System and the Epocrates Mobile Application [J].
Andrus, Miranda R. ;
Forrester, Jeanne B. ;
Germain, Kenda E. ;
Eiland, Lea S. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2015, 21 (04) :281-286
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1969, DELPHI METHOD EXPT S
[4]  
Balfour DC, 2009, J MANAGE CARE PHARM, V15, pS10
[5]   Potential value of electronic prescribing in health economic and outcomes research [J].
Cooke, Catherine E. ;
Isetts, Brian J. ;
Sullivan, Thomas E. ;
Fustgaard, Maren ;
Belletti, Daniel A. .
PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES, 2010, 1 :163-178
[6]   Electronic health records and electronic prescribing: Promise and pitfalls [J].
Cusack, Caithn M. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 35 (01) :63-+
[7]   AN EXPERIMENTAL APPLICATION OF THE DELPHI METHOD TO THE USE OF EXPERTS [J].
DALKEY, N ;
HELMER, O .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1963, 9 (03) :458-467
[8]  
Dhavie AA, 2015, J MANAG CARE SPEC PH, V21, P1025
[9]   Effect of Electronic Prescribing With Formulary Decision Support on Medication Use and Cost [J].
Fischer, Michael A. ;
Vogeli, Christine ;
Stedman, Margaret ;
Ferris, Timothy ;
Brookhart, Alan ;
Weissman, Joel S. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 168 (22) :2433-2439
[10]   E-prescribing collaboration in Massachusetts: Early experiences from regional prescribing projects [J].
Halamka, J ;
Aranow, M ;
Ascenzo, C ;
Bates, DW ;
Berry, K ;
Debor, G ;
Fefferman, J ;
Glaser, J ;
Heinhold, J ;
Stanley, J ;
Stone, DL ;
Sullivan, TE ;
Tripathi, M ;
Wilkinson, B .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2006, 13 (03) :239-244