BIOLOGICAL CYCLE OF SUSCEPTIBLE AND GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT SOURGRASS BIOTYPES IN TWO GROWTH PERIODS

被引:0
|
作者
Ferreira, S. D. [1 ]
Exteckoetter, V [1 ]
Gibbert, A. M. [1 ]
Barbosa, J. A. [1 ]
Costa, N., V
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Oeste Parana, Rondon, PR, Brazil
关键词
Digitaria insularis; growth analysis; weed; chemical control; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582018360100077
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Selecting glyphosate-resistant Digitaria insularis may cause changes in the biological cycle of the species. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biological cycle of susceptible and glyphosate-resistant D. insularis biotypes in two growth periods (summer/autumn and autumn/winter). Seeds were collected in the municipality of Alagoa Grande (07 degrees 02'59 '' S 35 degrees 37'01,5 '' W), and were considered susceptible (S1), in Cascavel (24 degrees 55'27 '' S 53 degrees 27'54.6 '' W) considered as resistant 1 (R1), Entre Rios do Oeste (24 degrees 40'44 '' S 54 degrees 17'05 '' W) considered as resistant 2 (R2) and Marechal Candido Rondon (24 degrees 42'30 '' S 54 degrees 21'10 '' W) considered as resistant 3 (R3). Evaluations were carried out in the summer/autumn and autumn/ winter periods. The collection periods of plants were: 14; 21; 28; 35; 42; 49; 56; 63; 70; 77; 84; 91; 98; 105; 112 and 119 days after emergence (DAE). The selection of glyphosate-resistant D. insularis biotypes in agricultural areas affected the biology of the species, in relation to the original population of the susceptible biotype. In the sununcr/auttunn period (mean temperature 24.6 degrees C), the S biotype started the emission of tillers and flowering at 14 and 21 DAE on an average, respectively, before the resistant biotypes. However, in the autumn/winter period (mean temperature 19.0 degrees C) only the R1 biotype was able to develop and complete the biological cycle. The evaluated biotypes presented differences during the development, mainly between the phenological stages, so that the susceptible biotype was the most precocious and with a high reproductive potential. The physiological evaluations showed no differences among the S, R1, R2 and R3 biotypes, as verified in the TCR.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The response of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible biotypes of junglerice (Echinochloa colona) to mungbean interference
    Mutti, Navneet Kaur
    Mahajan, Gulshan
    Jha, Prashant
    Chauhan, Bhagirath S.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2019, 67 (04) : 419 - 425
  • [2] Gene polymorphisms in glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible biotypes of Eleusine indica from Malaysia
    Ng, CH
    Wickneswari, R
    Salmijah, S
    Teng, YT
    Ismail, BS
    WEED RESEARCH, 2003, 43 (02) : 108 - 115
  • [3] Metabolic profiling of glyphosate-resistant sourgrass (Digitaria insularis)
    Gazola, Tiago
    Bianchi, Leandro
    Dias, Marcio Furriela
    Carbonari, Caio A.
    Velini, Edivaldo D.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (05) : 748 - 755
  • [4] The response of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible biotypes of Echinochloa colona to carbon dioxide, soil moisture and glyphosate
    Mahboobeh Mollaee
    Ahmadreza Mobli
    Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [5] The response of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible biotypes of Echinochloa colona to carbon dioxide, soil moisture and glyphosate
    Mollaee, Mahboobeh
    Mobli, Ahmadreza
    Chauhan, Bhagirath Singh
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [6] Detection of Sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) Biotypes Resistant to Glyphosate in Brazil
    de Carvalho, Leonardo Bianco
    Cruz-Hipolito, Hugo
    Gonzalez-Torralva, Fidel
    da Costa Aguiar Alves, Pedro Luis
    Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob
    De Prado, Rafael
    WEED SCIENCE, 2011, 59 (02) : 171 - 176
  • [7] Growth and root lignification of susceptible and glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Zonetti, Patricia da Costa
    Suzuki, Leticia Sayuri
    Bonini, Edicleia Aparecida
    Lucio Ferrarese, Maria de Lourdes
    Ferrarese-Filho, Osvaldo
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM-AGRONOMY, 2011, 33 (02) : 291 - 295
  • [8] The response of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible biotypes of annual sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) to mungbean density
    Mobli, Ahmadreza
    Matloob, Amar
    Chauhan, Bhagirath Singh
    WEED SCIENCE, 2019, 67 (06) : 642 - 648
  • [9] Seed-germination ecology of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible biotypes of Echinochloa colona in Australia
    Mutti, Navneet Kaur
    Mahajan, Gulshan
    Chauhan, Bhagirath Singh
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2019, 70 (04): : 367 - 372
  • [10] EFFICIENCY OF ISOLATED AND ASSOCIATED HERBICIDES TO CONTROL GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT SOURGRASS
    Cassol, M.
    Mattiuzzi, M. D.
    Albrecht, A. J. P.
    Albrecht, L. P.
    Baccin, L. C.
    Souza, C. N. Z.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2019, 37