Supervisee Perception of Power in Clinical Supervision: The Power Dynamics in Supervision Scale

被引:23
作者
Cook, Ryan M. [1 ]
McKibben, W. Bradley [2 ]
Wind, Stefanie A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Educ Studies Psychol Res Methodol & Couselin, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Nova Southeastern Univ, Dept Counseling, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Educ Res, Educ Measurement, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
关键词
supervision; power dynamics; Rasch modeling; psychology; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1037/tep0000201
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Power dynamics between supervisors and supervisees are inherent as a result of the hierarchical structure ot supervision. Failure to adequately attend to issues of power in supervision can result in ineffective or even harmful supervision. Currently, supervisors do not have an objective measure of power dynamics within the supervisory relationship or a tool that allows for ongoing measurement and discussion of power in supervision. The authors developed the Power Dynamics in Supervision Scale (PDSS) and investigated its psychometric properties with a sample of 267 supervisees. Results from the polytomous Rasch model indicated that the PDSS items (n = 16) explained 51.77% of the variance as a single factor. Item locations on the logit scale indicate supervisees perceive differing levels of power, meaning that PDSS items adequately identified differences in power perceptions among supervisees. Supervisees perceived themselves as possessing the most power on maintaining healthy boundaries with their supervisors, a willingness to feel vulnerable in supervision, and feeling empowered in supervision. They also perceived their supervisors as possessing the most power in identifying interventions to use with clients, setting goals for supervision, and providing feedback about clinical skills in supervision. Implications for supervisors and supervision research are provided in light of the findings.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 195
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] American Psychological Association, 2014, Guidelines for clinical supervision in health service psychology
  • [2] RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES
    ANDRICH, D
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) : 561 - 573
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, SCALE DEV THEORY APP
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, APPLYING RASCH MODEL, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315814698
  • [5] Bernard JM., 2014, FUNDAMENTALS CLIN SU, V5th
  • [6] Best Practices in Clinical Supervision: Evolution of a Counseling Specialty
    Borders, L. Dianne
    Glosoff, Harriet L.
    Welfare, Laura E.
    Hays, Danica G.
    Dekruyf, Lorraine
    Fernando, Delini M.
    Page, Betsy
    [J]. CLINICAL SUPERVISOR, 2014, 33 (01) : 26 - 44
  • [7] De Stefano J, 2017, CLIN SUPERV, V36, P223, DOI 10.1080/07325223.2017.1295893
  • [8] Inadequate and Harmful Clinical Supervision: Testing a Revised Framework and Assessing Occurrence
    Ellis, Michael V.
    Berger, Lauren
    Hanus, Alexa E.
    Ayala, Erin E.
    Swords, Brett A.
    Siembor, Michael
    [J]. COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGIST, 2014, 42 (04) : 434 - 472
  • [9] Engelhard G, 2013, INVARIANT MEASUREMENT: USING RASCH MODELS IN THE SOCIAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND HEALTH SCIENCES, P1
  • [10] Intersectionality, Power, and Relational Safety in Context: Key Concepts in Clinical Supervision
    Hernandez, Pilar
    McDowell, Teresa
    [J]. TRAINING AND EDUCATION IN PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 4 (01) : 29 - 35