Comparative Study of Classical and MPC Control for Single-Phase MMC Based on V-HIL Simulations

被引:4
作者
Majstorovic, Milovan [1 ]
Rivera, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Ristic, Leposava [1 ]
Wheeler, Patrick [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Sch Elect Engn, Belgrade 11120, Serbia
[2] Univ Talca, Fac Engn, Dept Elect Engn, Campus Curico, Curico 3341717, Chile
[3] Univ Nottingham, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
classical control; hardware-in-the-loop; model predictive control; modular multilevel converters; optimal switching state; MODULAR MULTILEVEL CONVERTERS; OPERATION;
D O I
10.3390/en14113230
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The operation of single-phase Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) is analyzed in the paper. A mathematical model of the converter is developed and described, based on which the structure and selection of parameters for Classical Control and Optimal Switching State Model Predictive Control (OSS-MPC) are defined. Additionally, the procedure for the determination of circuit parameters, such as submodule capacitance and arm inductance, is described and carried out. The listed control methods are designed and evaluated in Virtual Hardware-in-the-Loop together with single-phase MMC power circuit, regarding three control objectives: AC current control, voltage balancing control and circulating current control. Control methods are evaluated for both steady-state and transient performance and compared based on nine criteria: AC current reference tracking, THD of AC current and voltage, submodule capacitor voltage balancing, total submodule voltage control, circulating current magnitude and THD, number of control parameters and computational complexity. This is the first time that a fair comparison between Classical Control and MPC is considered in literature, resulting in superior performance of both control methods regarding four different criteria and the same performance regarding AC current reference tracking.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, P IEEE BOLOGNA POWER, DOI [DOI 10.1109/PTC.2003.1304266, 10.1109/PTC.2003.1304403, DOI 10.1109/PTC.2003.1304403]
[2]   Current control strategies for single phase grid integrated inverters for photovoltaic applications-a review [J].
Chatterjee, Aditi ;
Mohanty, Kanungo Barada .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 92 :554-569
[3]   Model Predictive Control of High-Power Modular Multilevel Converters-An Overview [J].
Dekka, Apparao ;
Wu, Bin ;
Yaramasu, Venkata ;
Lizana Fuentes, Ricardo ;
Zargari, Navid R. .
IEEE JOURNAL OF EMERGING AND SELECTED TOPICS IN POWER ELECTRONICS, 2019, 7 (01) :168-183
[4]   An Overview of Applications of the Modular Multilevel Matrix Converter [J].
Diaz, Matias ;
Cardenas Dobson, Roberto ;
Ibaceta, Efrain ;
Mora, Andres ;
Urrutia, Matias ;
Espinoza, Mauricio ;
Rojas, Felix ;
Wheeler, Patrick .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (21)
[5]  
Du Sixing., 2018, MODULAR MULTILEVEL C
[6]   Performance Analysis of Modular Multilevel Converter and Modular Multilevel Series Converter under Variable-Frequency Operation Regarding Submodule-Capacitor Voltage Ripple [J].
Gontijo, Gustavo ;
Wang, Songda ;
Kerekes, Tamas ;
Teodorescu, Remus .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (03)
[7]   On Energy Storage Requirements in Modular Multilevel Converters [J].
Ilves, Kalle ;
Norrga, Staffan ;
Harnefors, Lennart ;
Nee, Hans-Peter .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2014, 29 (01) :77-88
[8]   Steady-State Analysis of Interaction Between Harmonic Components of Arm and Line Quantities of Modular Multilevel Converters [J].
Ilves, Kalle ;
Antonopoulos, Antonios ;
Norrga, Staffan ;
Nee, Hans-Peter .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2012, 27 (01) :57-68
[9]   Operation and Control Methods of Modular Multilevel Converters in Unbalanced AC Grids: A Review [J].
Li, Jinke ;
Konstantinou, Georgios ;
Wickramasinghe, Harith R. ;
Pou, Josep .
IEEE JOURNAL OF EMERGING AND SELECTED TOPICS IN POWER ELECTRONICS, 2019, 7 (02) :1258-1271
[10]  
Majstorovic M., 2019, 2019 20 INT S POW, P1