Spatial factors and stated preference values for public goods: Considerations for rural land use

被引:59
作者
Johnston, RJ
Swallow, SK
Bauer, DM
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Avery Point, CT USA
[2] Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Environm & Nat Resource Econ, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3146848
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines whether and how survey respondents react to spatial factors in stated preference surveys, and the ways in which preferences for spatial factors may influence welfare estimation. Alternative proposals to develop rural lands for residential purposes in southern New England were studied. Results illustrate that spatial attributes can influence estimated willingness to pay for development plans, even in cases where spatial attributes are only presented as cartographic details of maps used to clarify survey scenarios. Moreover, we find that subtle, and potentially unintended, spatial features presented in choice questions may influence marginal valuation of non-spatial attributes.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 500
页数:20
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Swait, J ;
Boxall, P ;
Louviere, J ;
Williams, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 32 (01) :65-84
[2]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[3]   Modeling response incentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuation data [J].
Alberini, A ;
Kanninen, B ;
Carson, RT .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1997, 73 (03) :309-324
[4]  
Arendt R, 1994, RURAL DESIGN MAINTAI
[5]   Noah's mandate and the birth of urban bioplanning [J].
Babbitt, B .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1999, 13 (03) :677-678
[6]   Non-users' willingness to pay for a National Park: An application and critique of the contingent valuation method [J].
Bateman, IJ ;
Langford, IH .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 1997, 31 (06) :571-582
[7]  
BERGSTROM JC, 1989, W J AGR EC, V14, P98
[8]  
BERGSTROM JD, 1989, AM J AGR ECON, V71, P321
[9]   Contingent valuation and the activation of environmental norms [J].
Blamey, R .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 24 (01) :47-72
[10]   A test of policy labels in environmental choice modelling studies [J].
Blamey, RK ;
Bennett, JW ;
Louviere, JJ ;
Morrison, MD ;
Rolfe, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 32 (02) :269-286