Study on the quantification of ecological compensation in a river basin considering different industries based on water pollution loss value

被引:25
作者
Guan, Xinjian [1 ]
Hou, Shengling [1 ]
Meng, Yu [1 ]
Liu, Wenkang [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Water Conservancy Sci & Engn, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] China Water Resources & Hydropower Engn Bohai Con, Tianjin 300222, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Ecological compensation; Quantification model; Emergy analysis theory; Pollution loss rate; Value of water resources; Xiaohong river basin; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; CONTINGENT VALUATION; MANAGEMENT; PAYMENT; IRRIGATION; RESOURCES; OFFSETS; QUALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-019-06215-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The study on the quantification of ecological compensation (eco-compensation) in a river basin can help to make environmental protection more compatible with ecological construction. In this paper, the upstream and downstream of the river basin were treated as the subjects and objects of eco-compensation, and the mechanism of eco-compensation was clarified. The emergy analysis theory (EMA) was used to calculate the values of water resources in sub-industries (agriculture, industry, life, and recreation). The pollution loss rate theory (PLR) was adopted to calculate the water pollution loss rate in sub-industries. According to the value of water resources and pollution loss rate in sub-industries, combined with the water consumption of sub-industries in the river basin, the Ecological Compensation Quantification Model of Sub-industries (ECQ-Is Model) was constructed. Under the guidance of the aforementioned theory and model, a comprehensive research was conducted on the Xiaohong River. The results showed that the eco-compensation values of the upstream area, industry, and agriculture in the river basin were higher. Therefore, it is essential that the water resources in the Xiaohong River basin be well conserved and managed. In addition, the research results point out the direction for water pollution control, which includes promoting the coordinated development of the upstream and downstream, and maximizing the ecological benefits of the river basin.
引用
收藏
页码:30954 / 30966
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Antony BE, 2014, INTERN MED J, V44, P5
[2]   Mapping ecological vulnerability to fire for effective conservation management of natural protected areas [J].
Aretano, Roberta ;
Semeraro, Teodoro ;
Petrosillo, Irene ;
De Marco, Antonella ;
Pasimeni, Maria Rita ;
Zurlini, Giovanni .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2015, 295 :163-175
[3]  
Bock K, 2015, ECOSYSTEM SERVICES C
[4]   Cultural Ecosystem Services and Popular Perceptions of the Benefits of an Ecological Restoration Project in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest [J].
Brancalion, Pedro H. S. ;
Villarroel Cardozo, Ines ;
Camatta, Allan ;
Aronson, James ;
Rodrigues, Ricardo R. .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2014, 22 (01) :65-71
[5]   Implementing ecological compensation in New Zealand: stakeholder perspectives and a way forward [J].
Brown, M. A. ;
Clarkson, B. D. ;
Barton, B. J. ;
Joshi, C. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND, 2014, 44 (01) :34-47
[6]   Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice [J].
Bull, Joseph W. ;
Suttle, K. Blake ;
Gordon, Ascelin ;
Singh, Navinder J. ;
Milner-Gulland, E. J. .
ORYX, 2013, 47 (03) :369-380
[7]   BioBanking: an environmental scientist's view of the role of biodiversity banking offsets in conservation [J].
Burgin, Shelley .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2008, 17 (04) :807-816
[8]   Using energy systems theory to define, measure, and interpret ecological integrity and ecosystem health [J].
Campbell, DE .
ECOSYSTEM HEALTH, 2000, 6 (03) :181-204
[9]  
Chen HaiYing Chen HaiYing, 2015, Tourism Tribune, V30, P53
[10]  
Chunling Z, 2015, J CHINA I WATER RESO