Evaluation of the management of rectal cancers before and after the consensus conference in France

被引:9
作者
Phelip, JM
Milan, C
Herbert, C
Grosclaude, P
Arveux, P
Raverdy, N
Daures, JP
Faivre, J
机构
[1] Cote DOr & Sanone & Loire Canc Registry, Dijon, France
[2] Calvados Canc Registry, Caen, France
[3] Tarn Canc Registry, Albi, France
[4] Doubs Canc Registry, Besancon, France
[5] Somme Canc Registry, Amiens, France
[6] Herault Canc Registry, Montpellier, France
关键词
rectal cancer; management; population-based study; consensus conference;
D O I
10.1097/00042737-200410000-00009
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives Population-based registries are the best way to draw a picture of the management of a disease. The purpose of this study was to analyse therapeutic modalities for rectal cancers in seven French areas in 1990 and 1995, before and just after a consensus conference devoted to this topic. Methods A community-based series of 945 patients (402 in 1990, 543 in 1995) with rectal cancer was used to assess therapeutic modalities and stage at diagnosis. Results Colonoscopy was performed in most of the cases (90% in 1990 and 1995). There was significant change between 1990 and 1995 in stage at diagnosis and cancer resection. The rate of continence-preserving operations was similar in 1990 and in 1995, as was the rate of adjuvant radiotherapy. There was a shift between 1990 and 1995 from postoperative radiotherapy to preoperative radiotherapy. There was an increase in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion Changes in the management of rectal cancer in France over the past few years have concerned mainly resection rate, stage at diagnosis and adjuvant therapy. The recommendations of the consensus conference were followed only partly, in particular for adjuvant preoperative radiotherapy, which has not reached its full development, and adjuvant chemotherapy, which tends to be overprescribed, considering how little is known about its effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:1003 / 1009
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] *ANDEM, 1994, C CONS CHOIX THER CA
  • [2] Arnaud S, 1998, GASTROEN CLIN BIOL, V22, P500
  • [3] BOUTRON MC, 1988, CANCER, V75, P347
  • [4] Cafiero F, 1995, Eur J Surg Oncol, V21, P391, DOI 10.1016/S0748-7983(95)92549-X
  • [5] CEDERMARK B, 1995, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V75, P2269, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950501)75:9<2269::AID-CNCR2820750913>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-I
  • [7] The influence of age on resection rates and postoperative mortality in 6457 patients with colorectal cancer
    Damhuis, RAM
    Wereldsma, JCJ
    Wiggers, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1996, 11 (01) : 45 - 48
  • [8] Evidence of improving survival of patients with rectal cancer in France: a population based study
    Finn-Faivre, C
    Maurel, J
    Benhamiche, AM
    Herbert, C
    Mitry, E
    Launoy, G
    Faivre, J
    [J]. GUT, 1999, 44 (03) : 377 - 381
  • [9] PREOPERATIVE OR POSTOPERATIVE IRRADIATION IN ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM - FINAL TREATMENT RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED TRIAL AND AN EVALUATION OF LATE SECONDARY EFFECTS
    FRYKHOLM, GJ
    GLIMELIUS, B
    PAHLMAN, L
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1993, 36 (06) : 564 - 572
  • [10] Population-based study of the treatment and prognosis of carcinoma of the rectum
    Goudet, P
    Roy, P
    Arveux, I
    Cougard, P
    Faivre, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 84 (11) : 1546 - 1550