Sustainability in Science Education? How the Next Generation Science Standards Approach Sustainability, and Why It Matters

被引:67
作者
Feinstein, Noah Weeth [1 ,2 ]
Kirchgasler, Kathryn L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Madison, WI 53704 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Community & Environm Sociol, Madison, WI 53704 USA
关键词
ECOLOGICAL MODERNIZATION; GLOBALIZATION; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1002/sce.21137
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this essay, we explore how sustainability is embodied in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), analyzing how the NGSS explicitly define and implicitly characterize sustainability. We identify three themes (universalism, scientism, and technocentrism) that are common in scientific discourse around sustainability and show how they appear in the NGSS. Taken together, these themes evoke a technology-centered perspective called ecological modernization that defines sustainability as a set of global problems affecting all humans equally and solvable through the application of science and technology. We argue that students who are taught to think about sustainability from this perspective will be less able to see its ethical and political dimensions and less prepared for the political realities of a pluralist, democratic society that must balance the needs of multiple groups and integrate science with other sources of knowledge to develop contextualized responses to sustainability challenges. One compelling alternative is a systematic collaboration between science educators and social studies educators, in which the complementary pedagogical strengths of both fields are combined to provide realistic and powerful preparation for future sustainability challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 144
页数:24
相关论文
共 90 条
[61]   Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories [J].
Miller, Thaddeus R. .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2013, 8 (02) :279-293
[62]  
National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), 2013, College, career and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards
[63]  
National Research Council, 2003, REV EV WORKSH SUMM W
[64]  
Newell P., 2005, Global Environmental Politics, V5, P70, DOI DOI 10.1162/1526380054794835
[65]  
Nixon R., 2011, SLOW VIOLENCE ENV PO
[66]   Environmental science, sustainability and politics [J].
O'Riordan, T .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 2004, 29 (02) :234-247
[67]   ENVIRONMENTALISM AND EDUCATION [J].
ORIORDAN, T .
JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1981, 5 (01) :3-17
[68]  
Orr D., 1992, ECOLOGICAL LITERACY
[69]   Characterizing a sustainability transition: Goals, targets, trends, and driving forces [J].
Parris, TM ;
Kates, RW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (14) :8068-8073
[70]   Currents in STSE Education: Mapping a Complex Field, 40 Years On [J].
Pedretti, Erminia ;
Nazir, Joanne .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2011, 95 (04) :601-626