Bone mineral density in women using the subdermal contraceptive implant Implanon for at least 2 years

被引:24
作者
Pongsatha, Saipin [1 ]
Ekmahachai, Molrudee [2 ]
Suntornlimsiri, Nuchanart [1 ]
Morakote, Nuntana [1 ]
Chaovisitsaree, Somsak [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
关键词
Bone mass density; Contraceptive implant; Distal radius; Distal Ulna Femur; Implanon; Lumbar spine; DEPOT MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; THAI WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.01.018
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the effect of the long-term use of a subdermal single-rod contraceptive implant on bone mineral density (BMD) between users and a control group. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, BMD was measured at the lumbar spine, femur, and distal radius and ulna in 100 Thai women of reproductive age, 50 who had used the Implanon implant for contraception for at least 2 years and 50 controls. Results: Ethnicity, age, age at menarche, parity, menstrual pattern, and body mass index were similar in the 2 groups. The mean duration of Implanon use was 32.8 +/- 6.3 months. Although the prevalence of osteoporosis was rare at all sites in both groups, the Implanon users had a significantly lower BMD at the distal radius and ulna than the controls. Conclusion: The long-term use of Implanon seemed to have a negative impact on the mineral density of the distal radius and ulna. (C) 2010 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 225
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] A prospective study of the forearm bone density of users of etonorgestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants
    Bahamondes, L
    Monteiro-Dantas, C
    Espejo-Arce, X
    Fernandes, AMD
    Lui-Filho, JF
    Perrotti, M
    Petta, CA
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 (02) : 466 - 470
  • [2] Bone mineral density during long-term use of the progestagen contraceptive implant Implanon® compared to a non-hormonal method of contraception
    Beerthuizen, R
    van Beek, A
    Massai, R
    Mäkäräinen, L
    in't Hout, J
    Bennink, HC
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (01) : 118 - 122
  • [3] A prospective comparison of bone density in adolescent girls receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera), levonorgestrel (Norplant), or oral contraceptives
    Cromer, BA
    Blair, JM
    Mahan, JD
    Zibners, L
    Naumovski, Z
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1996, 129 (05) : 671 - 676
  • [4] DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS ON BONE-DENSITY OF PROGESTOGEN-ONLY METHODS FOR CONTRACEPTION IN PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN
    NAESSEN, T
    OLSSON, SE
    GUDMUNDSON, J
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 1995, 52 (01) : 35 - 39
  • [5] Pongchaiyaku Chatlert, 2008, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V91, P295
  • [6] Sivin I, 2002, JADELLE LEVONORGESTR, P1
  • [7] SPEROFF L, 2001, CLIN GUIDE CONTRACEP, P190
  • [8] Bone mineral density during long-term treatment with Norplant(R) implants and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate - A cross-sectional study of Thai women
    Taneepanichskul, S
    Intaraprasert, S
    Theppisai, U
    Chaturachinda, K
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 1997, 56 (03) : 153 - 155
  • [9] Trivitayaratana Wanna, 2005, J Med Assoc Thai, V88 Suppl 5, pS8