Analysis of drivers' deceleration behavior based on naturalistic driving data

被引:20
|
作者
Li, Shuang [1 ]
Li, Penghui [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yao, Yao [5 ]
Han, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Xu, Yanhai [6 ]
Chen, Long [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Control & Simulat Ctr, Harbin, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Vehicle & Mobil, State Key Lab Automot Safety & Energy, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] China Automot Engn Res Inst Co Ltd, State Key Lab Vehicle NVH & Safety Technol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Minist Transport, Rd Safety Res Ctr, Res Inst Highway, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Xihua Univ, Sichuan Key Lab Automot Control & Safety, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Deceleration mode; naturalistic driving data; logistic regression; intelligent vehicle; AUTOMATION;
D O I
10.1080/15389588.2019.1707194
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: As one of the bases for designing a humanlike brake control system for the intelligent vehicle, drivers' deceleration behavior needs to be understood. There are two modes for drivers' deceleration behavior: (i) brake pedal input, by applying brake system to reduce the speed; (ii) no pedal input, by releasing the accelerator pedal without pressing the brake pedal, thus decelerating by naturalistic driving resistance. The deceleration behavior that drivers choose to press the brake pedal has been investigated in previous studies. However, releasing the accelerator pedal behavior has not received much attention. The objective of this study is to investigate factors that influence drivers' choice of the two deceleration modes using naturalistic driving data, which provide a theoretical foundation for the design of the brake control system. Methods: A logistic model was constructed to model drivers' deceleration mode, valued as "no pedal input" or "brake pedal input" for dependent variables. Factors such as Light condition, Intersection mode, Road alignment, Traffic flow, Traffic light, Ego-vehicle motion state, Lead vehicle motion state, Time headway (THW), and Ego-vehicle speed were considered in the model as independent variables. Results: 393 deceleration events were selected from the naturalistic driving data, which used as the database for the regression model. As a result, 6 remarkable factors were found to influence drivers' deceleration model, which include Traffic flow, Intersection mode, Lead vehicle motion state, Ego-vehicle motion state, Ego-vehicle speed and THW. Specifically, (1) the possibility of drivers choosing "no pedal input" is gradually increasing with the increase of THW and speed; (2) The drivers prefer to choose "no pedal input" when the lead vehicle is decelerating compared to it's stationary. This probability is relatively high when the lead vehicle is traveling along the road; (3) the possibility of choosing "no pedal input" at intersection is higher than roads without intersection; (4) the possibility of choosing "no pedal input" is higher when traveling with more traffic flow. Conclusion: The drivers' deceleration behavior can be divided into "no pedal input" and "brake pedal input." The following six factors significantly affect drivers' choice of deceleration mode: Traffic flow, Intersection mode, Lead vehicle motion state, Ego-vehicle motion state, Ego-vehicle speed and THW. The logistic regression model can quantify the influence of these six factors on drivers' deceleration behavior. This study provides a theoretical basis for the braking system design of ADAS (Advanced Driving Assistant System) and intelligent control system.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 47
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of Driver Emergency Steering Lane Changing Behavior Model Based on Naturalistic Driving Data
    Wu B.
    Zhu X.
    Shen J.
    Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 2019, 47 (11): : 1618 - 1625
  • [22] Driving Risk Assessment using Cluster Analysis based on Naturalistic Driving Data
    Zheng, Yang
    Wang, Jianqiang
    Li, Xiaofei
    Yu, Chenfei
    Kodaka, Kenji
    Li, Keqiang
    2014 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2014, : 2584 - 2589
  • [23] Analysis on the driving behavior of old drivers by driving recorder GPS trajectory data
    Zhu, Yuanfang
    Jiang, Meilan
    Yamamoto, Toshiyuki
    ASIAN TRANSPORT STUDIES, 2022, 8
  • [24] Research on driving behavior characteristics of older drivers based on drivers' behavior graphs analysis
    Li, Jingyang
    Guo, Fengxiang
    Li, Wei
    Tian, Bijiang
    Chen, Zheng
    Qu, Sirou
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (08)
  • [25] Driver behavior analysis for right-turn drivers at signalized intersections using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study data
    Wu, Jianqing
    Xu, Hao
    JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2017, 63 : 177 - 185
  • [26] Using naturalistic driving data to examine drivers' seatbelt use behavior: Comparison between teens and adults
    Bao, Shan
    Xiong, Huimin
    Buonarosa, Mary Lynn
    Sayer, James R.
    JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2015, 54 : 69 - 73
  • [27] Deceleration Timing Relating a Driver’s State Based on Naturalistic Driving Behavior Database during Approach to Intersection
    Shino M.
    Minami K.
    Kamata M.
    Hiramatsu M.
    Sunda T.
    International Journal of Automotive Engineering, 2019, 10 (01) : 106 - 112
  • [28] Naturalistic Yielding Behavior of Drivers at an Unsignalized Intersection based on Survival Analysis
    Gankhuyag, Delgermaa
    Olaverri-Monreal, Cristina
    2023 IEEE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, ITSC, 2023, : 2316 - 2322
  • [29] Using naturalistic driving data to better understand the driving exposure and patterns of older drivers
    Molnar, Lisa J.
    Eby, David W.
    Bogard, Scott E.
    LeBlanc, David J.
    Zakrajsek, Jennifer S.
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2018, 19 : S83 - S88
  • [30] Investigation of Driver Lane Keeping Behavior in Normal Driving based on Naturalistic Driving Study Data
    Johnson, Taylor
    Chen, Rong
    Sherony, Rini
    Gabler, Hampton C.
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY, 2016, 4 (02) : 236 - 244