Determinantion of visitors' willingness to pay to enter Karagol Natural Park of Ankara, Turkey

被引:3
作者
Serefoglu, Coskun [1 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Dev Agcy, Business Dev & Strategy Unit, Cadde 11, TR-1322 Ankara, Turkey
来源
CIENCIA RURAL | 2018年 / 48卷 / 07期
关键词
Double dichotomous bid; Probit model; Contingent Valuation; Natural park; WTP; NATIONAL-PARK; ECONOMIC VALUE; ENTRANCE FEES; USER FEES; VALUATION; FAIRNESS;
D O I
10.1590/0103-8478cr20170869
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were to assess visitors' attitudes, if visitors would be willing to pay to enter Lake Karagol, and what factors affect their decision to pay. The contingent valuation method was used to estimate the economic value of the lake by assessing willingness to pay (WTP). Double dichotomous questions were used in the survey. Respondents were first asked whether or not they would be willing to pay the starting bid. They could either answer in the affirmative (that is, accepted bid) or in the negative (that is, reject the starting bid). The average WTP for an entrance fee was found to be about USD 0.22 for all observations when zero bids were included, and about USD 4.40 when zero bids were excluded. Result of the probit model showed that respondents with a higher income, respondents who were young, and the working status of the respondents had significant impacts on the probability of the WTP.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   USER FEES AND EQUITY ISSUES IN PUBLIC HUNTING EXPENDITURES - THE CASE OF RING-NECKED PHEASANT IN OREGON [J].
ADAMS, RM ;
BERGLAND, O ;
MUSSER, WN ;
JOHNSON, SL ;
MUSSER, LM .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1989, 65 (04) :376-385
[2]   The Recreational Value of Rohtas Fort, Pakistan [J].
Ahmed, Naeem ;
Hussain, Anwar .
ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2016, 21 (07) :782-794
[3]  
AMEMIYA T, 1981, J ECON LIT, V19, P1483
[4]  
[Anonymous], ENV DEV EC
[5]  
Arrow K., 1993, Federal Register
[6]  
Belkayali N, 2010, SCI RES ESSAYS, V5, P934
[7]  
Bruner A., 2015, Tourists willingness to pay to visit Tanzania's National Parks: A contingent valuation study
[8]  
CAKMAKYAPAN S., 2013, J SOCIAL EC STAT, V2
[9]  
Cummings R.G., 1986, VALUING ENV GOODS AS
[10]  
DRIVER B, 1984, P FEES OUTDOOR RECRE, P45