Modelling the barriers of Lean Six Sigma for Indian micro-small medium enterprises An ISM and MICMAC approach

被引:54
作者
Singh, Mahipal [1 ]
Kumar, Pankaj [1 ]
Rathi, Rajeev [1 ]
机构
[1] Lovely Profess Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Phagwara, India
关键词
Lean Six Sigma; LSS barriers; Interpretive structural modelling; Indian micro-small medium enterprises; MICMAC analysis; SUCCESS FACTORS; IMPLEMENTATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; PERFORMANCE; ENABLERS; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-12-2018-0205
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the barriers of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) and develop the interrelationship among them using interpretive structural modelling (ISM) and Matriced Impact Croises Multiplication Appliquee a un Classement (MICMAC). Design/methodology/approachUsing systematic literature review and expert's opinions, 26 LSS barriers have been extracted and finalized through statistical analysis, that is importance-index analysis and corrected item minus total correlation methods. The statistical analysis of purified 22 LSS barriers has been carried out and consistency of finalized barriers has been checked through reliability statistical test in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software. Finally, the contextual relationship among finalized LSS barriers is developed using ISM and MICMAC approach. FindingsThe ISM model indicates that insufficient management commitment and involvement, lack of resources, lack of training and education, lack of strategic thinking, lack of training funds are strategic factors; improper project selection, poor selection of employee for belt training, lack of total employee involvement, lack of awareness of about LSS are prudent factors; unclear vision, high implementation cost, resistance to culture change, weak supplier linkage, poor alignment between company's goal and customer demand are burst factors. Furthermore, MICMAC analysis is splitting the LSSBs in four clusters according to their driving power and dependency. These results provide a clear mind-set to engineering manager for focusing more on LSS barriers according to their driving power and dependency. Research limitations/implicationsThere may be biasness in making pairwise comparison matrix of barriers due to involvement of expert's opinion as human error. Practical implicationsThe outcome of this paper provides robust practical implication for LSS researchers and practitioners. The researcher and practitioners must consciously concentrate on the identified LSSBs more conventionally during LSS implementation, and they need to plan strategically to avoid any implementation failure. Originality/valueFor successful implementation of LSS in any organization, it is necessary and permeable to make strategy for controlling LSS barriers at initial stage. So this paper is a leading attempt to highlight main LSS barriers and interrelate them using ISM and MICMAC approach. It provides a clear path for tackling LSS barriers to engineering managers, researchers and consultants.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 695
页数:23
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Critical success factors of Lean Six Sigma deployment: a current review
    Abu Bakar, Fairul Anwar
    Subari, Khairanum
    Daril, Mohd Amran Mohd
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2015, 6 (04) : 339 - 348
  • [2] Agarwal A., 2003, Journal of Advances in Management Research, V1, P28, DOI [DOI 10.1108/97279810380000356, 10.1108/97279810380000356]
  • [3] Modeling agility of supply
    Agarwal, Ashish
    Shankar, Ravi
    Tiwari, M. K.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2007, 36 (04) : 443 - 457
  • [4] Critical failure factors of Lean Six Sigma: a systematic literature review
    Albliwi, Saja
    Antony, Jiju
    Lim, Sarina
    van der Wiele, Ton
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (09) : 1012 - 1030
  • [5] Lean Six Sigma for small- and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: a systematic review
    Alexander, Paul
    Antony, Jiju
    Rodgers, Bryan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 36 (03) : 378 - 397
  • [6] Ambekar Suhas, 2017, TQM Journal, V29, P744, DOI 10.1108/TQM-02-2017-0021
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2006, THE TQM MAGAZINE
  • [8] Antony J., 2009, MANAG RES NEWS, V32, P413, DOI [10.1108/01409170910952921, DOI 10.1108/01409170910952921]
  • [9] Antony J, 2017, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V34, P1073, DOI 10.1108/IJQRM-03-2016-0035
  • [10] Lean Six Sigma and Innovation - an exploratory study among UK organisations
    Antony, Jiju
    Setijono, Djoko
    Dahlgaard, Jens J.
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2016, 27 (1-2) : 124 - 140