Explaining consumer suspicion: insights of a vignette study on online product reviews

被引:8
作者
Kollmer, Tim [1 ]
Eckhardt, Andreas [1 ]
Reibenspiess, Victoria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Innsbruck, Univ Str 15, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Washington State Univ, Carson Coll Business, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
Product reviews; Online purchasing behavior; Deception; Suspicion; Vignette study; WORD-OF-MOUTH; TEXT ANALYSIS; FAKE REVIEWS; CREDIBILITY; DECEPTION; IMPACT; PERSUASION; RATINGS; ABILITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12525-022-00549-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As part of the online product and service selection and purchase process, many consumers consult and rely on online product reviews. In order to persuade potential customers to buy their products, many organizations and businesses post deceptive product reviews of their own products on their own or third-party websites to their advantage. This creates consumer suspicion about the authenticity and veracity of online product reviews. To better understand how consumers' experiences of having been deceived by deceptive online product reviews in the past and the density of deception characteristics in an online product review influence their level of suspicion about the review and, ultimately, their intention to buy the product, we conduct a 3 x 3 vignette study. Our results indicate that deceptive characteristics in online product reviews and prior encounters with deception in online marketplaces increase consumer suspicion. Furthermore, we show that preference for a specific product decreases consumer suspicion about reviews of that product. Lastly, we demonstrate that consumer suspicion towards a product decreases purchase intention.
引用
收藏
页码:1221 / 1238
页数:18
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Gottfredson, Ryan K. ;
Joo, Harry .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2013, 16 (02) :270-301
[2]   Answering questions about questions: A persuasion knowledge perspective for understanding the effects of rhetorical questions [J].
Ahluwalia, R ;
Burnkrant, RE .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (01) :26-42
[3]  
Altman D. G., 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, DOI DOI 10.1002/SIM.4780101015
[4]   Reviews Without a Purchase: Low Ratings, Loyal Customers, and Deception [J].
Anderson, Eric T. ;
Simester, Duncan I. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2014, 51 (03) :249-269
[5]   Customer perception of the deceptiveness of online product reviews: A speech act theory perspective [J].
Ansari, Sana ;
Gupta, Sumeet .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 57
[6]   Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research [J].
Atzmueller, Christiane ;
Steiner, Peter M. .
METHODOLOGY-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2010, 6 (03) :128-138
[7]   Product type and consumers' perception of online consumer reviews [J].
Bae, Soonyong ;
Lee, Taesik .
ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2011, 21 (04) :255-266
[8]  
Banerjee S., 2014, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, ICUIMC 2014, P1, DOI DOI 10.1145/2557977.2557984
[9]   Theorizing the textual differences between authentic and fictitious reviews Validation across positive, negative and moderate polarities [J].
Banerjee, Snehasish ;
Chua, Alton Y. K. .
INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 27 (02) :321-337
[10]   A framework for fake review detection in online consumer electronics retailers [J].
Barbado, Rodrigo ;
Araque, Oscar ;
Iglesias, Carlos A. .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 56 (04) :1234-1244