Working During Pandemic Disasters: Views and Predictors of EMS Providers

被引:16
作者
Alwidyan, Mahmoud T. [1 ]
Oteir, Alaa O. [1 ,2 ]
Trainor, Joseph [3 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Appl Med Sci, Dept Allied Med Sci, Paramed Program, Irbid, Jordan
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Paramed, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Delaware, Disaster Res Ctr, Biden Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Newark, DE USA
关键词
civil defense; disaster medicine; disease outbreaks; emergency medical services; emergency nursing; EMERGENCY MEDICAL-SERVICES; HEALTH-CARE PERSONNEL; WILLINGNESS; PERCEPTIONS; RESPOND; DUTY;
D O I
10.1017/dmp.2020.131
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aims to assess the perception and attitude of emergency medical services (EMS) providers toward working during disease outbreaks, and the factors that may influence their decisions to ultimately work or not. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study assessing the attitude of EMS providers to work during disease outbreaks. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were performed to assess attitudes toward reporting for duty and factors that influence providers' decisions. Results: Of the 500 surveys distributed, 466 (93.2%) were complete and included for analysis. The majority of participants (70.2%) are male with a mean age of 27 (SD 4.3) years. The study found that the majority (71.1%) of participants are willing to come to work during disease outbreaks. The study found 7 predictors of reporting for duty. Confidence that employer will provide adequate protective gear was the most significant predictor (odds ratio [OR], 3.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.31-5.42). Concern for family safety was the most important barrier against coming to work (OR, 0.40; 95% CI = 0.21-0.73). Conclusions: Providing adequate supplies of protective gear along with knowledge and training for disease outbreak are the main factors that enhance providers to fulfill their work expectations.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 122
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Alwidyan MT., 2016, NAT HAZARDS CENT, V40
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Traffic Safety Facts 2012 Data
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, HLTH WORKER EBOLA IN
[4]   Gauging US Emergency Medical Services Workers' Willingness to Respond to Pandemic Influenza Using a Threat- and Efficacy-Based Assessment Framework [J].
Barnett, Daniel J. ;
Levine, Roger ;
Thompson, Carol B. ;
Wijetunge, Gamunu U. ;
Oliver, Anthony L. ;
Bentley, Melissa A. ;
Neubert, Patrick D. ;
Pirrallo, Ronald G. ;
Links, Jonathan M. ;
Balicer, Ran D. .
PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (03)
[5]  
Bissell R A, 1999, Prehosp Emerg Care, V3, P140, DOI 10.1080/10903129908958923
[6]  
Chaffee Mary, 2009, Disaster Med Public Health Prep, V3, P42, DOI 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31818e8934
[7]   When and Why Health Care Personnel Respond to a Disaster: The State of the Science [J].
Connor, Susan B. .
PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2014, 29 (03) :270-274
[8]   Healthcare workers' perceptions of the duty to work during an influenza pandemic [J].
Damery, S. ;
Draper, H. ;
Wilson, S. ;
Greenfield, S. ;
Ives, J. ;
Parry, J. ;
Petts, J. ;
Sorell, T. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2010, 36 (01) :12-18
[9]   Factors Associated with the Willingness of Health Care Personnel to Work During an Influenza Public Health Emergency: An Integrative Review [J].
Devnani, Mahesh .
PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (06) :551-566
[10]   The willingness of US emergency medical technicians to respond to terrorist incidents [J].
DiMaggio, C ;
Markenson, D ;
Loo, GT ;
Redlener, I .
BIOSECURITY AND BIOTERRORISM-BIODEFENSE STRATEGY PRACTICE AND SCIENCE, 2005, 3 (04) :331-337