Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception

被引:146
作者
Samaranayake, C. B. [1 ]
Luo, C. [1 ]
Plank, A. W. [2 ]
Merrie, A. E. H. [1 ]
Plank, L. D. [1 ]
Bissett, I. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Surg, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[2] Univ So Queensland, Dept Math & Comp, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
关键词
Ventral rectopexy; rectal prolapse; rectal intussusception; systematic review; LAPAROSCOPIC ANTERIOR RECTOPEXY; ORR-LOYGUE; FECAL INCONTINENCE; CONSTIPATION; PROMONTORY; DEFECATION; MANAGEMENT; DISORDERS; SYMPTOMS; IMPROVES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01934.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of ventral rectopexy (VR) surgery for treatment of rectal prolapse (RP) and rectal intussusception (RI) in adults. Method MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and other relevant databases were searched to identify studies. Randomized controlled trials or nonrandomized studies with more than 10 patients receiving ventral mesh rectopexy surgery were considered for the review. Results Twelve nonrandomized case series studies with 728 patients in total are included in the review. Seven studies used the Orr-Loygue procedure (VR with posterior rectal mobilization to the pelvic floor) and five studies used VR without posterior rectal mobilization. Overall weighted mean percentage decrease in faecal incontinence (FI) rate was 45%. The weighted mean percentage decrease in constipation rate was 24%. Weighted mean recurrence rate was 3.4%. Conclusions There are limitations in published literature on VR. The available data indicate that VR has low recurrence and improves FI in patients suffering from these conditions. There is a greater reduction in postoperative constipation if VR is used without posterior rectal mobilization.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 512
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients
    Agachan, F
    Chen, T
    Pfeifer, J
    Reissman, P
    Wexner, SD
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (06) : 681 - 685
  • [2] Simple improved confidence intervals for comparing matched proportions
    Agresti, A
    Min, YY
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (05) : 729 - 740
  • [3] Amorotti Claudio, 2003, Chir Ital, V55, P399
  • [4] Armitage P., 2001, STAT METHODS MED RES, V4th
  • [5] Bissett IP, 2000, SEMIN SURG ONCOL, V18, P207, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(200004/05)18:3<207::AID-SSU4>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-D
  • [7] Comparison of laparoscopic rectopexy with open technique in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse - Clinical and functional results
    Boccasanta, P
    Rosati, R
    Venturi, M
    Montorsi, M
    Cioffi, U
    De Simone, M
    Strinna, M
    Peracchia, A
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 8 (06) : 460 - 465
  • [8] BRAZZELLI M, 1999, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V4
  • [9] PROCIDENTIA OF RECTUM STUDIED WITH CINERADIOGRAPHY - A CONTRIBUTION TO DISCUSSION OF CAUSATIVE MECHANISM
    BRODEN, B
    SNELLMAN, B
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1968, 11 (05) : 330 - &
  • [10] BRUNET C, 1994, LYON CHIR, V90, P187