Dose and schedule as determinants of outcomes in chemotherapy for breast cancer

被引:17
作者
Budman, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, N Shore Univ Hosp, Div Oncol, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.11.021
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Many cytotoxic agents for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer are available, but they have produced only modest results, even when the tumor burden is low. This relative lack of efficacy may be attributed, in part, to the nonspecificity of the current regimens. Additionally, there is evidence that the chemotherapy doses used in clinical practice are not optimal, which potentially compromises the outcomes when the thresholds of dose intensity are not reached. Variations in treatment underscore the need to return to the basics of chemotherapy administration: dose, schedule, concentration threshold, and therapeutic index. In patients with metastatic breast cancer a clear dose-response curve has been shown with some agents, including anthracyclines. The E-max model, which in its simplest form assumes a direct relation between the dose of a drug and its effect, may be used to improve dosing in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Consistent with this model, threshold effects have been observed in treatment with both anthracyclines and paclitaxel for breast cancer. There is also evidence that using dose-dense schedules may produce better outcomes with some regimens. Maintaining chemotherapy agents at full dose on schedule is crucial to treatment success, especially in adjuvant therapy. Consequently, treatment practices should use both dose intensity and dose compression to increase the likelihood of positive outcomes in patients with breast cancer. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 9
页数:7
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Abe O, 1998, LANCET, V352, P930
  • [2] Dose-response relationship of epirubicin in the treatment of postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer: A randomized study of epirubicin at four different dose levels performed by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group
    Bastholt, L
    Dalmark, M
    Gjedde, SB
    Pfeiffer, P
    Pedersen, D
    Sandberg, E
    Kjaer, M
    Mouridsen, HT
    Rose, C
    Nielsen, OS
    Jakobsen, P
    Bentzen, SM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (04) : 1146 - 1155
  • [3] Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer:: a randomised trial
    Bergh, J
    Wiklund, T
    Erikstein, B
    Lidbrink, E
    Lindman, H
    Malmström, P
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P
    Bengtsson, NO
    Söderlund, G
    Anker, G
    Wist, E
    Ottosson, S
    Salminen, E
    Ljungman, P
    Holte, H
    Nilsson, J
    Blomqvist, C
    Wilking, N
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) : 1384 - 1391
  • [4] Best use of adjuvant systemic therapies II, chemotherapy aspects: dose of chemotherapy - cytotoxicity, duration and responsiveness
    Bergh, J
    [J]. BREAST, 2003, 12 (06) : 529 - 537
  • [5] INFLUENCE OF TREATMENT SCHEDULE ON TOXICITY AND EFFICACY OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, EPIRUBICIN, AND FLUOROURACIL IN METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING WEEKLY AND EVERY-4-WEEK ADMINISTRATION
    BLOMQVIST, C
    ELOMAA, I
    RISSANEN, P
    HIETANEN, P
    NEVASAARI, K
    HELLE, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) : 467 - 473
  • [6] DOSE-RESPONSE EFFECT OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST-CANCER
    BONADONNA, G
    VALAGUSSA, P
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1981, 304 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [7] Predictive cancer genomics - what do we need?
    Brenton, JD
    Caldas, C
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 362 (9381) : 340 - 341
  • [8] Doubling epirubicin dose intensity (100 mg/m(2) versus 50 mg/m(2)) in the FEC regimen significantly increases response rates. An international randomised phase III study in metastatic breast cancer
    Brufman, G
    Colajori, E
    Ghilezan, N
    Lassus, M
    Martoni, A
    Perevodchikova, N
    Tosello, C
    Viaro, D
    Zielinski, C
    Krainer, M
    Salzer, H
    Schuller, J
    Dittrich, C
    Scheithauer, W
    Zamagni, C
    Ambrosini, G
    Colucci, G
    Gentilini, P
    Zaniboni, A
    Pacini, P
    Bianco, R
    Mustacchi, G
    DAprile, M
    DeMatteis, A
    Oliveira, C
    Jordaan, J
    Gudgeon, A
    VanZyl, J
    Rakowsky, E
    Inbar, M
    Rath, P
    Cohen, Y
    Shani, A
    Fried, G
    Hegg, R
    Neto, AB
    Bader, G
    Braga, RF
    Vitoc, C
    Puerto, VML
    Valle, AE
    Salazar, JD
    Sanchez, JC
    Villela, GM
    Fountzilas, G
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [9] Dose and dose intensity as determinants of outcome in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer
    Budman, DR
    Berry, DA
    Cirrincione, CT
    Henderson, IC
    Wood, WC
    Weiss, RB
    Ferree, CR
    Muss, HB
    Green, MR
    Norton, L
    Frei, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (16) : 1205 - 1211
  • [10] Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer
    Chang, JC
    Wooten, EC
    Tsimelzon, A
    Hilsenbeck, SG
    Gutierrez, MC
    Elledge, R
    Mohsin, S
    Osborne, CK
    Chamness, GC
    Allred, DC
    O'Connell, P
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 362 (9381) : 362 - 369