Data-driven causal inference of process-structure relationships in nanocatalysis

被引:11
作者
Ting, Jonathan Y. C. [1 ]
Barnard, Amanda [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Comp, 145 Sci Rd, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
MACHINE; INSIGHTS; DESIGN; QSAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.coche.2022.100818
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
While the field of nanocatalysis has benefited from the application of conventional machine learning methods by leveraging the correlations between processing/structure/ property variables, the outcomes from purely correlational studies lack actionability due to missing mechanistic insights. Statistical learning, particularly causal inference, can potentially provide access to more actionable insights by allowing the discovery and verification of deeply obscured causal relationships between variables, using strong correlations identified from interpretable machine learning models as starting points. Recent studies that exemplify the collaborative usage of correlational and causal analysis in catalysis are discussed, including studies potentially benefiting from this approach. Some challenges remaining in the application of inference techniques to the field are identified and suggestions of future directions are provided.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [31] Oppewal H., 2010, Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781444316568.WIEM02059
  • [32] Classification of platinum nanoparticle catalysts using machine learning
    Parker, A. J.
    Opletal, G.
    Barnard, A. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2020, 128 (01)
  • [33] The pure and representative types of disordered platinum nanoparticles from machine learning
    Parker, Amanda J.
    Motevalli, Benyamin
    Opletal, George
    Barnard, Amanda S.
    [J]. NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 32 (09)
  • [34] Statistics and causal inference: A review
    Pearl, J
    [J]. TEST, 2003, 12 (02) : 281 - 318
  • [35] Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research
    Pingault, Jean-Baptiste
    O'Reilly, Paul F.
    Schoeler, Tabea
    Ploubidis, George B.
    Rijsdijk, Fruhling
    Dudbridge, Frank
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2018, 19 (09) : 566 - 580
  • [36] Posch K., 2021, Sociological Methods Research, V50, P1376, DOI [10.1177/0049124119826159, DOI 10.1177/0049124119826159]
  • [37] Materials Informatics: The Materials "Gene" and Big Data
    Rajan, Krishna
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, VOL 45, 2015, 45 : 153 - 169
  • [38] "Why Should I Trust You?" Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
    Ribeiro, Marco Tulio
    Singh, Sameer
    Guestrin, Carlos
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 1135 - 1144
  • [39] Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveries
    Roscher, Ribana
    Bohn, Bastian
    Duarte, Marco F.
    Garcke, Jochen
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 42200 - 42216
  • [40] Saal James E., 2020, Annual Review of Materials Research, V50, P49, DOI 10.1146/annurev-matsci-090319010954