Data-driven causal inference of process-structure relationships in nanocatalysis

被引:11
作者
Ting, Jonathan Y. C. [1 ]
Barnard, Amanda [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Comp, 145 Sci Rd, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
MACHINE; INSIGHTS; DESIGN; QSAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.coche.2022.100818
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
While the field of nanocatalysis has benefited from the application of conventional machine learning methods by leveraging the correlations between processing/structure/ property variables, the outcomes from purely correlational studies lack actionability due to missing mechanistic insights. Statistical learning, particularly causal inference, can potentially provide access to more actionable insights by allowing the discovery and verification of deeply obscured causal relationships between variables, using strong correlations identified from interpretable machine learning models as starting points. Recent studies that exemplify the collaborative usage of correlational and causal analysis in catalysis are discussed, including studies potentially benefiting from this approach. Some challenges remaining in the application of inference techniques to the field are identified and suggestions of future directions are provided.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Toward a Design of Active Oxygen Evolution Catalysts: Insights from Automated Density Functional Theory Calculations and Machine Learning
    Back, Seoin
    Tran, Kevin
    Ulissi, Zachary W.
    [J]. ACS CATALYSIS, 2019, 9 (09): : 7651 - 7659
  • [2] Nanoinformatics, and the big challenges for the science of small things
    Barnard, A. S.
    Motevatti, B.
    Parker, A. J.
    Fischer, J. M.
    Feigt, C. A.
    Opletal, G.
    [J]. NANOSCALE, 2019, 11 (41) : 19190 - 19201
  • [3] Selecting machine learning models for metallic nanoparticles
    Barnard, Amanda S.
    Opletal, George
    [J]. NANO FUTURES, 2020, 4 (03) : 1 - 12
  • [4] Bochman A, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P1730
  • [5] How To Optimize Materials and Devices via Design of Experiments and Machine Learning: Demonstration Using Organic Photovoltaics
    Cao, Bing
    Adutwum, Lawrence A.
    Oliynyk, Anton O.
    Luber, Erik J.
    Olsen, Brian C.
    Mar, Arthur
    Buriak, Jillian M.
    [J]. ACS NANO, 2018, 12 (08) : 7434 - 7444
  • [6] Machine learning and the physical sciences
    Carleo, Giuseppe
    Cirac, Ignacio
    Cranmer, Kyle
    Daudet, Laurent
    Schuld, Maria
    Tishby, Naftali
    Vogt-Maranto, Leslie
    Zdeborova, Lenka
    [J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2019, 91 (04)
  • [7] Causality matters in medical imaging
    Castro, Daniel C.
    Walker, Ian
    Glocker, Ben
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [8] ARCHETYPAL ANALYSIS
    CUTLER, A
    BREIMAN, L
    [J]. TECHNOMETRICS, 1994, 36 (04) : 338 - 347
  • [9] Drivers of understory species richness in reconstructed boreal ecosystems: a structural equation modeling analysis
    Das Gupta, Sanatan
    Pinno, Bradley D.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [10] Geisser Florian, 2020, P INT C AUTOMATED PL, P384, DOI DOI 10.1609/ICAPS.V30I1.6684