From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A Review and Analysis of Paradigm Shift for the People, Organization and Technology

被引:161
作者
Zizic, Marina Crnjac [1 ]
Mladineo, Marko [1 ]
Gjeldum, Nikola [1 ]
Celent, Luka [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Split, Fac Elect Engn Mech Engn & Naval Architecture, Rudera Boskovica 32, Split 21000, Croatia
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Mech & Design Engn, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, Hants, England
关键词
Industry; 4; 0; 5; people; Operator; organization; technology; COVID-19; BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION; FRAMEWORK; FUTURE; IMPLEMENTATION; PERSPECTIVE; RESILIENCE; CHALLENGES; COMPANIES; MATURITY; TOOLS;
D O I
10.3390/en15145221
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The industry is a key driver of economic development. However, changes caused by introduction of modern technologies, and increasing complexity of products and production, directly affect the industrial enterprises and workers. The critics of the Industry 4.0 paradigm emphasized its orientation to new technologies and digitalization in a technocratic way. Therefore, the new industrial paradigm Industry 5.0 appeared very soon and automatically triggered a debate about the role of, and reasons for applying, the new paradigm. Industry 5.0 is complementing the existing Industry 4.0 paradigm with the orientation to the worker who has an important role in the production process, and that role has been emphasized during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this research, there is a brief discussion on main drivers and enablers for introduction of these new paradigms, then a literature-based analysis is carried out to highlight the differences between two paradigms from three important aspects-people, organization, and technology. The conclusion emphasizes the main features and concerns regarding the movement towards Industry 5.0, and the general conclusion is that there is a significant change of the main research aims from sustainability towards human-centricity. At the end, the analysis of maturity models that evaluates enterprises' readiness to introduce features of new paradigms is given as well.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]   Resilience in family and nonfamily firms: an examination of the relationships between manufacturing strategy, competitive strategy and firm performance [J].
Acquaah, Moses ;
Amoako-Gyampah, Kwasi ;
Jayaram, Jayanth .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2011, 49 (18) :5527-5544
[2]  
Al-Ayed S., 2019, Business Theory and Practice, V20, P179, DOI [10.3846/btp.2019.17, DOI 10.3846/BTP.2019.17]
[3]  
Aljinovic A., 2020, PROCEDIA MANUF, V45, P158, DOI [10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.088, DOI 10.1016/J.PROMFG.2020.04.088]
[4]   A lightweight approach for human factor assessment in virtual assembly designs: an evaluation model for postural risk and metabolic workload [J].
Alkan, Bugra ;
Vera, Daniel ;
Ahmad, Mussawar ;
Ahmad, Bilal ;
Harrison, Robert .
6TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON ASSEMBLY TECHNOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS (CATS), 2016, 44 :26-31
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, IMPULS IND 4 0 READI
[6]  
[Anonymous], PWC IND 4 0 ENABLING
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Directorates-General for Migration and Home Affairs and for Research and Innovation, Guidance note: Potential misuse of research, version 2.0, P2
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Industria Conectada 4.0, DOI DOI 10.15358/0935-0381-2015-8-9-515
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Blockchain meets industry 4.0 -what happened next?
[10]  
Baheti R., 2011, The Impact of Control Technology, P161, DOI DOI 10.1145/1795194.1795205