Novel morphing wing actuator control-based Particle Swarm Optimisation

被引:8
作者
Khan, S. [1 ]
Grigorie, T. L. [1 ,2 ]
Botez, R. M. [1 ]
Mamou, M. [3 ]
Mebarki, Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Technol Super, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Mil Tech Acad Ferdinand I, Bucharest, Romania
[3] CNR, Ottawa, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Morphing wing; Actuation system; BLDC motor; Control tuning; Particle Swarm Optimisation; Experimental model; Wind-tunnel testing; PROPORTIONAL-INTEGRAL CONTROLLER; ON-OFF CONTROLLER; AERODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; CONTROL VALIDATION; MECHANISM;
D O I
10.1017/aer.2019.114
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The paper presents the design and experimental testing of the control system used in a new morphing wing application with a full-scaled portion of a real wing. The morphing actuation system uses four similar miniature brushless DC (BLDC) motors placed inside the wing, which execute a direct actuation of the flexible upper surface of the wing made from composite materials. The control system of each actuator uses three control loops (current, speed and position) characterised by five control gains. To tune the control gains, the Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) method is used. The application of the PSO method supposed the development of a MATLAB/Simulink (R) software model for the controlled actuator, which worked together with a software sub-routine implementing the PSO algorithm to find the best values for the five control gains that minimise the cost function. Once the best values of the control gains are established, the software model of the controlled actuator is numerically simulated in order to evaluate the quality of the obtained control system. Finally, the designed control system is experimentally validated in bench tests and wind-tunnel tests for all four miniature actuators integrated in the morphing wing experimental model. The wind-tunnel testing treats the system as a whole and includes, besides the evaluation of the controlled actuation system, the testing of the integrated morphing wing experimental model and the evaluation of the aerodynamic benefits brought by the morphing technology on this project. From this last perspective, the airflow on the morphing upper surface of the experimental model is monitored by using various techniques based on pressure data collection with Kulite pressure sensors or on infrared thermography camera visualisations.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 75
页数:21
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Distributed actuation concepts for a morphing aileron device
    Amendola, G.
    Dimino, I.
    Magnifico, M.
    Pecora, R.
    [J]. AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 120 (1231) : 1365 - 1385
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, SWARM
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, THESIS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2007, AIAA ATM FLIGHT MECH
  • [5] Numerical and experimental validation of a full scale servo-actuated morphing aileron model
    Arena, Maurizio
    Amoroso, Francesco
    Pecora, Rosario
    Amendola, Gianluca
    Dimino, Ignazio
    Concilio, Antonio
    [J]. SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 27 (10)
  • [6] Airfoil Structural Morphing Based on SMA Actuator Series: Numerical and Experimental Studies
    Barbarino, S.
    Pecora, R.
    Lecce, L.
    Concilio, A.
    Ameduri, S.
    De Rosa, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MATERIAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, 2011, 22 (10) : 987 - 1004
  • [7] Wing morphing control with shape memory alloy actuators
    Bil, Cees
    Massey, Kevin
    Abdullah, Ermira J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MATERIAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, 2013, 24 (07) : 879 - 898
  • [8] Piezoceramic composite actuators for a solid-state variable-camber wing
    Bilgen, Onur
    Friswell, Michael I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MATERIAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, 2014, 25 (07) : 806 - 817
  • [9] Particle swarm approach in finding optimum aircraft configuration
    Blasi, L.
    Del Core, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2007, 44 (02): : 679 - 683
  • [10] Numerical and experimental validation of a morphed wing geometry using Price-Paidoussis wind-tunnel testing
    Botez, R. M.
    Koreanschi, A.
    Sugar-Gabor, O.
    [J]. AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 120 (1227) : 757 - 795