EVALUATING THE DECODING THE DISCIPLINES PARADIGM THAT IS USED FOR DEVELOPING DISCIPLINARY HABITS OF MIND: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

被引:0
作者
Mohamed, S. [1 ]
Bayat, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Cape, Lib Serv Learning & Teaching, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Western Cape, Sch Business & Finance, Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
bottlenecks; Decoding the Disciplines; disposition; efficacy; habits of mind; mind theory; student learning; systematic review; troublesome knowledge; ways of thinking;
D O I
10.20853/36-1-4517
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article reports on a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the Decoding the Disciplines paradigm (henceforth "DtD") in the development of expert disciplinary habits of mind in student learning. A search was conducted utilising various databases (EBSCOhost, DOAJ, JSTOR, SAGE Journals Online, Scopus, Wiley Online and uKwazi) (Library Search Engine) for the period 2004 to 2020. More than 500 papers, retrieved from nine scholarly databases, were screened, based on title and abstract, resulting in 33 shortlisted papers for analysis. The researcher and one independent reviewer assessed the methodological quality of the shortlisted articles. Five countries are represented in this study. The results of this review highlighted the impact that the DtD has on the development of expert ways of thinking in learners. The case studies attest to the fact that several insights, namely 1) Concretising abstract phenomena; 2) Overcoming emotional bottlenecks; 3) Making expert habits of mind explicit to the learner; 4) Trans-disciplinary approaches and the T-Shaped learner and 5) Synergies between threshold concepts and information literacy habits of mind, are capabilities that the DtD process could cultivate in student learning to overcome complex bottlenecks.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 233
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Rubin B.M., 2004, New Directions for Teaching Learning, P67, DOI DOI 10.1002/TL.148
  • [42] Schlegel Whitney M, 2004, NEW DIRECTIONS TEACH, V98, P75
  • [43] Sturts Jill R., 2012, SCHOLE J LEISURE STU, V27, p39.45, DOI [10.1080/1937156X.2012.11949364, DOI 10.1080/1937156X.2012.11949364]
  • [44] Overcoming Student Resistance to Learning Research Methods: An Approach Based on Decoding Disciplinary Thinking
    Sundt, Jody
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE EDUCATION, 2010, 21 (03) : 266 - 284
  • [45] Tingerthal John Steven, 2013, THESIS N ARIZONA U
  • [46] Verpoorten D., 2017, P 2 EUR C SCHOL TEAC
  • [47] Yeo M., 2017, New Directions for Teaching Learning, V150, P49, DOI DOI 10.1002/TL.20237
  • [48] Yeo Michelle, 2017, NEW DIRECTIONS TEACH, V150, P87, DOI DOI 10.1002/TL.20240
  • [49] Zhu C., 2012, Journal of College Science Teaching, V41, P54
  • [50] Zolan M., 2004, New Directions for Teaching Learning, P23, DOI DOI 10.1002/TL.144