Identifying research priorities for digital technology in mental health care: results of the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership

被引:111
作者
Hollis, Chris [1 ]
Sampson, Stephanie [2 ]
Simons, Lucy [3 ]
Davies, E. Bethan [3 ]
Churchill, Rachel [2 ]
Betton, Victoria [4 ]
Butler, Debbie [1 ]
Chapman, Kathy [5 ]
Easton, Katherine [6 ]
Gronlund, Toto Anne [7 ]
Kabir, Thomas [8 ]
Rawsthorne, Mat [1 ]
Rye, Elizabeth [9 ]
Tomlin, Andre [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, Nottingham NG7 2TU, England
[2] Univ York, Ctr Reviews & Disseminat & Cochrane Common Mental, York, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Natl Inst Hlth Res MindTech MedTech Cooperat, Inst Mental Hlth, Nottingham, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Leeds & York Partnership NHS Fdn Trust, mHabitat, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Oxleas NHS Fdn Trust, Mental Hlth Intelligence & Leadership Programme, Dartford, England
[6] Univ Sheffield, Innovat Ctr, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Ctr Assist Technol & Connected Healthcare, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[7] Univ Southampton, James Lind Alliance, Southampton, Hants, England
[8] McPin Fdn, London, England
[9] De Montfort Univ, Serv User & Carer Res Audit Network, Leicester, Leics, England
[10] Minervat Ltd, Natl Elf Serv, Oxford, England
关键词
INTERVENTIONS; DEPRESSION; DISORDERS; THERAPY; PATIENT; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30296-7
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Digital technology, including the internet, smartphones, and wearables, provides the possibility to bridge the mental health treatment gap by offering flexible and tailored approaches to mental health care that are more accessible and potentially less stigmatising than those currently available. However, the evidence base for digital mental health interventions, including demonstration of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in real-world settings, remains inadequate. The James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership for digital technology in mental health care was established to identify research priorities that reflect the perspectives and unmet needs of people with lived experience of mental health problems and use of mental health services, their carers, and health-care practitioners. 644 participants contributed 1369 separate questions, which were reduced by qualitative thematic analysis into six overarching themes. Following removal of out-of-scope questions and a comprehensive search of existing evidence, 134 questions were verified as uncertainties suitable for research. These questions were then ranked online and in workshops by 628 participants to produce a shortlist of 26. The top ten research priorities, which were identified by consensus at a stakeholder workshop, should inform research policy and funding in this field. Identified priorities primarily relate to the safety and efficacy of digital technology interventions in comparison with face-to-face interventions, evidence of population reach, mechanisms of therapeutic change, and the ways in which the effectiveness of digital interventions in combination with human support might be optimised.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 854
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Andersson, Gerhard ;
Cuijpers, Pim ;
Carlbring, Per ;
Riper, Heleen ;
Hedman, Erik .
WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 13 (03) :288-295
[2]   Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders [J].
Andersson, Gerhard ;
Titov, Nickolai .
WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 13 (01) :4-11
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The James Lind Alliance Guidebook. Version 8
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT US ATT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, THE ECONOMIST
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, PRIME MINISTER UNVEI
[7]  
Baker C., 2018, Mental health statistics: Prevalence, services, and funding in England
[8]   The therapeutic alliance in internet interventions: A narrative review and suggestions for future research [J].
Berger, Thomas .
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2017, 27 (05) :511-524
[9]   The WPA-Lancet Psychiatry Commission on the Future of Psychiatry [J].
Bhugra, Dinesh ;
Tasman, Allan ;
Pathare, Soumitra ;
Priebe, Stefan ;
Smith, Shubulade ;
Torous, John ;
Arbuckle, Melissa R. ;
Langford, Alex ;
Alarcon, Renato D. ;
Chiu, Helen Fung Kum ;
First, Michael B. ;
Kay, Jerald ;
Sunkel, Charlene ;
Thapar, Anita ;
Udomratn, Pichet ;
Baingana, Florence K. ;
Kestel, Devora ;
Ng, Roger Man Kin ;
Patel, Anita ;
De Picker, Livia ;
McKenzie, Kwame Julius ;
Moussaoui, Driss ;
Muijen, Matt ;
Bartlett, Peter ;
Davison, Sophie ;
Exworthy, Tim ;
Loza, Nasser ;
Rose, Diana ;
Torales, Julio ;
Brown, Mark ;
Christensen, Helen ;
Firth, Joseph ;
Keshavan, Matcheri ;
Li, Ang ;
Onnela, Jukka-Pekka ;
Wykes, Til ;
Elkholy, Hussein ;
Kalra, Gurvinder ;
Lovett, Kate F. ;
Travis, Michael J. ;
Ventriglio, Antonio .
LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 4 (10) :775-818
[10]   E-Health Technologies Show Promise In Developing Countries [J].
Blaya, Joaquin A. ;
Fraser, Hamish S. F. ;
Holt, Brian .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2010, 29 (02) :244-251