COMPARATIVE ANIMAL STUDY ON HARD TISSUE INTEGRATION AND BONE FORMATION OF DIFFERENT NOBEL BIOCARE IMPLANTS

被引:0
作者
Gedrange, T. [1 ]
Gredes, T. [1 ]
Gredes, M. [1 ]
Allegrini, M. R. F. [2 ]
Borsos, G. [3 ]
Vegh, A. [3 ]
Salles, M. B. [4 ]
Heinemann, F. [1 ]
Dominiak, M. [5 ]
Allegrini, S., Jr. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Dept Orthodont Prevent & Pediat Dent, Greifswald, Germany
[2] Odontol Ctr Militar Policy, Dept Dent, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Heim Pal Children Hosp, Dept Orthodont, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Anat, Inst Biomed Sci, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Med, Dept Oral Surg, Wroclaw, Poland
[6] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Biomat Nucl Energy Res Inst IPEN, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY | 2009年 / 60卷
关键词
dental implant; primary stability; hard tissue integration; bone remodeling; osteogenesis; hydroxyapatite; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; SURFACE; SUBSTITUTE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Dental implantation aims at optimal and long-term hard tissue integration. Beside primary stability, loading time and other factors, e.g. the surface of the endosteal part of the implant, is a matter of special importance. In this animal trial, hard tissue integration of two different implant types was studied using radiological, histological and histomorphometric analysis. Two different implants with an oxidized surface (TiUnite; Nobel Biocare AB, Goteborg, Sweden, NobelReplace (R) Tapered Groovy 4.3 x 10 mm and Replace Select Tapered 4.3 x 10 mm) were inserted into the right and left mandibles of 10 German domestic pigs between canine and premolar and immediately provided with a ceramic crown. The primary implant stability was determined using resonance frequency analysis. After 70 days, the test animals were killed and specimens were collected for histological and histomorphometric examination. All implants showed good primary stability after surgery. Histological and histomorphometrical analysis revealed no significant differences in the bone apposition. The immediate loading of the different implant types don't have any negative effects on the bone apposition in the period of 70 days. The long-term effects of immediate loading of these types of implant requires further studies.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 121
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ALBREKTSSON T, 1999, TRATADO PERIODONTIA, P623
[2]  
Allegrini S, 2008, J PHYSIOL PHARMACOL, V59, P117
[3]  
Boyan B. D., 2003, European Cells & Materials, V6, P22
[4]   Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response [J].
Boyan, BD ;
Hummert, TW ;
Dean, DD ;
Schwartz, Z .
BIOMATERIALS, 1996, 17 (02) :137-146
[5]  
Brunette D M, 1988, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V3, P231
[6]  
Cochran DL, 1998, J BIOMED MATER RES, V40, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-Q
[8]   Simulation of bone strain by orthodontic implants using the finite element method [J].
Gedrange, T ;
Bourauel, C ;
Köbel, C ;
Harzer, W .
BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2003, 48 (10) :287-290
[9]   Three-dimensional analysis of endosseous palatal implants and bones after vertical, horizontal, and diagonal force application [J].
Gedrange, T ;
Bourauel, C ;
Köbel, C ;
Harzer, W .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2003, 25 (02) :109-115
[10]  
Gedrange T, 2008, J PHYSIOL PHARMACOL, V59, P87