The esophageal biopsy "pull" sign: a highly specific and treatment-responsive endoscopic finding in eosinophilic esophagitis (with video)

被引:23
|
作者
Dellon, Evan S. [1 ,2 ]
Gebhart, Jessica H. [1 ]
Higgins, Leana L. [1 ]
Hathorn, Kelly E. [1 ]
Woosley, John T. [3 ]
Shaheen, Nicholas J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Ctr Esophageal Dis & Swallowing, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Ctr Gastrointestinal Biol & Dis, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol,Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS; MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; CHILDREN; ADULTS; FLUTICASONE; VARIABILITY; PREVALENCE; WHITE; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.046
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Esophageal biopsy specimens from patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) can feel firm, with resistance felt when pulling the forceps to obtain the tissue sample. We aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of the esophageal biopsy "pull" sign and determine its histologic associations and response to treatment. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of adults undergoing outpatient upper endoscopy. Cases of EoE were diagnosed per consensus guidelines, and patients were subsequently treated with either topical steroids or dietary elimination. Control subjects were individuals who did not have EoE. The frequency of the esophageal biopsy "pull" sign was assessed in EoE patients and controls, and diagnostic metrics were calculated. The "pull" sign was also reassessed in patients after therapy. Results: A total of 83 EoE patients and 121 control subjects were included. Sixty-three EoE patients (76%) were "pull" sign positive compared with just 2 control subjects (2%; P <.001), corresponding to a sensitivity and specificity of 76% and 98%, positive and negative predictive values of 97% and 86%, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 45.9 and 0.245, respectively. The "pull" sign was the strongest endoscopic predictor of EoE case status at baseline and was less frequent after successful treatment (20% vs 79%; P <.001). Conclusions: The "pull" sign is highly specific for EoE and is rarely seen in non-EoE control subjects. In patients with EoE who respond to treatment, the "pull" sign often resolves. The "pull" sign may be a simple and easily obtained measure of esophageal remodeling.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 100
页数:9
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Clinical and Endoscopic Characteristics do Not Reliably Differentiate PPI-Responsive Esophageal Eosinophilia and Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Patients Undergoing Upper Endoscopy: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Dellon, Evan S.
    Speck, Olga
    Woodward, Kimberly
    Gebhart, Jessica H.
    Madanick, Ryan D.
    Levinson, Sidney
    Fritchie, Karen J.
    Woosley, John T.
    Shaheen, Nicholas J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 (12): : 1854 - 1860
  • [2] PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia cannot be distinguished from eosinophilic esophagitis by endoscopic signs
    Warners, Marijn J.
    van Rhijn, Bram D.
    Curvers, Wouter L.
    Smout, Andreas J. P. M.
    Bredenoord, Albert J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 27 (05) : 506 - 511
  • [3] Management of proton pump inhibitor responsive-esophageal eosinophilia and eosinophilic esophagitis: controversies in treatment approaches
    Kochar, Bharati
    Dellon, Evan S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 9 (11) : 1359 - 1369
  • [4] Similarities and differences among eosinophilic esophagitis, proton-pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia, and reflux esophagitis: comparisons of clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological findings in Japanese patients
    Jiao, Dijin
    Ishimura, Norihisa
    Maruyama, Riruke
    Ishikawa, Noriyoshi
    Nagase, Mamiko
    Oshima, Naoki
    Aimi, Masahito
    Okimoto, Eiko
    Mikami, Hironobu
    Izumi, Daisuke
    Okada, Mayumi
    Ishihara, Shunji
    Kinoshita, Yoshikazu
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 52 (02) : 203 - 210