A Time Tradeoff Method for Eliciting Partner's Quality of Life due to Patient's Health States in Prostate Cancer

被引:34
作者
Basu, Anirban [1 ,2 ]
Dale, William [3 ,4 ]
Elstein, Arthur
Meltzer, David [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Ctr Hlth & Social Sci, Dept Med, Gen Internal Med Sect, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Ctr Hlth & Social Sci, Dept Med, Sect Hematol Oncol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Ctr Hlth & Social Sci, Dept Med, Sect Geriatr & Palliat Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Harris Sch Publ Policy Studies, Dept Econ, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Univ Chicago, Ctr Hlth & Social Sci, Dept Med, Gen Internal Med Sect, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
utilities; spillover effects; time trade-off; prostate cancer; cost-effectiveness analysis; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; PREFERENCES; ALTRUISM; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X09349959
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Cost-effectiveness analyses may better reflect the full costs and benefits of medical interventions if they incorporate the effects of patients' health on their family members. Objective. To develop and apply a time tradeoff (TTO) technique to measure the impact of potential prostate cancer-related health states of the patients on the quality of life (QOL) of their partners. Methods. We developed modified TTO questions and applied them in a pilot study in which we asked the partner of the patient to tradeoff his or her own life in order to reduce the burden that he himself or she herself expects to experience if the patient developed one of the prostate cancer-related health states. We reviewed the theoretical justification for this question and carefully framed the question so as to reduce measurement error and also to avoid possible double counting with the effect on the partner's health. Results. We collected data from 26 partners about their preferences for their own health, which is influenced by the patient's health condition. The mean QOL weights for the partners when the patients are the following states are healthy, 0.81; impotent, 0.66; incontinent, 0.68; have metastatic disease, 0.50; and dead, 0.28. Partners' responses varied by how close they felt to the patients. Low correlations between partners' and patients' QOL ratings (n = 15) suggest that the partners were not responding as proxies for the patient. Conclusions. A new TTO method is proposed to measure a partner's QOL due to a patient's health. Preliminary test results of validity were promising.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 365
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780195108248.001.0001
[2]   Implications of spillover effects within the family for medical cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Basu, A ;
Meltzer, D .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 24 (04) :751-773
[3]  
Bergstrom T., 1982, VALUE LIFE SAFETY P, P3
[4]   Efficient intra-household allocations: A general characterization and empirical tests [J].
Browning, M ;
Chiappori, PA .
ECONOMETRICA, 1998, 66 (06) :1241-1278
[5]   A theoretical framework for TTO valuations of health [J].
Buckingham, Ken ;
Devlin, Nancy .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2006, 15 (10) :1149-1154
[6]   The validity of time trade-off values in calculating QALYs: constant proportional time trade-off versus the proportional heuristic [J].
Dolan, P ;
Stalmeier, P .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 22 (03) :445-458
[7]   Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Garber, AM ;
Phelps, CE .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1997, 16 (01) :1-31
[8]  
HICKS JR, 1943, REV ECON STUD, V5, P559
[9]   The family as producer of health - an extended grossman model [J].
Jacobson, L .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2000, 19 (05) :611-637
[10]  
Johannesson M., 1996, THEORY METHODS EC EV