Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: A systematic review and development of practice standards

被引:242
作者
Wright, F. C.
De Vito, C.
Langer, B.
Hunter, A.
机构
[1] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gen Surg, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Canc Care Ontarios Program Evidence Based Care, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[3] Canc Care Ontario, Surg Oncol Program, Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada
关键词
cancer care; multidisciplinary; tumour boards; practice guidelines; multidisciplinary cancer conferences;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2007.01.025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) are a forum for health care providers to discuss diagnostic and treatment aspects of a cancer patient's care. In Ontario, we have found that very few hospitals have developed cancer conferences or forums for the prospective discussion of patient cancer care. In this paper, we describe the process of creating a province-wide standards document for MCCs. Methods: A systematic review and environmental scan were conducted to evaluate the literature regarding the impact of MCCs on physician practice patterns and patient outcomes, using the methodology of the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle. An Expert Panel was created to develop draft MCC standards. Ontario administrators and practitioners were surveyed to elicit feedback regarding the standards document. The findings were collated, and practice standards were developed. Results: Multidisciplinary care, predominantly in the form of multidisciplinary clinics, has been shown to improve patient outcomes. While only limited evidence suggested a benefit for MCCs, they have been documented as influential in changing patient management plans. MCCs were also found to be part of standard cancer care on an international level. Ontario practitioners surveyed generally supported MCC implementation. Discussion: We have described the process of creating an Ontario MCC standards document, including a literature review and an examination of the attitudes of Ontario practitioners and hospital administrators regarding the development and implementation of a MCC Standards document. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1002 / 1010
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
*AM COLL SURG, 2006, CANC PROGR STAND
[2]  
*AM COLL SURG, 2003, CANC PROGR STAND
[3]  
Bauman Glenn, 2005, Can J Urol, V12, P2532
[4]   TUMOR BOARD - IS IT WORTH SAVING [J].
BERMAN, HL .
MILITARY MEDICINE, 1975, 140 (08) :529-531
[5]   The development of a telemedical cancer center within the veterans affairs health care system:: a report of preliminary clinical results [J].
Billingsley, KG ;
Schwartz, DL ;
Lentz, S ;
Vallières, E ;
Montgomery, RB ;
Schubach, W ;
Penson, D ;
Yueh, B ;
Chansky, H ;
Zink, C ;
Parayno, D ;
Starkebaum, G .
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2002, 8 (01) :123-130
[6]   Effect of process standards on survival of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England [J].
Birchall, M ;
Bailey, D ;
King, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (08) :1477-1481
[7]   Progress of clinical oncology guidelines development using the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle: The role of practitioner feedback [J].
Browman, GP ;
Newman, TE ;
Mohide, EA ;
Graham, ID ;
Levine, MN ;
Pritchard, KI ;
Evans, WK ;
Maroun, JA ;
Hodson, DI ;
Carey, MS ;
Cowan, DH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (03) :1226-1231
[8]   THE PRACTICE GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT CYCLE - A CONCEPTUAL TOOL FOR PRACTICE GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION [J].
BROWMAN, GP ;
LEVINE, MN ;
MOHIDE, EA ;
HAYWARD, RSA ;
PRITCHARD, KI ;
GAFNI, A ;
LAUPACIS, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (02) :502-512
[9]  
Calman K., 1995, POLICY FRAMEWORK COM
[10]   Multidisciplinary team working, clinical networks, and chambers; opportunities to work differently in the NHS [J].
Carter, S ;
Garside, P ;
Black, A .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 :I25-I28