Participatory Land Administration on Customary Lands: A Practical VGI Experiment in Nanton, Ghana

被引:40
作者
Asiama, Kwabena [1 ]
Bennett, Rohan [2 ]
Zevenbergen, Jaap [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat ITC, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Swinburne Univ Technol, Swinburne Business Sch, Melbourne, Vic 3122, Australia
关键词
land administration; crowdsourcing; participation; VGI; land consolidation; VOLUNTEERED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION; BOTTOM-UP; TECHNOLOGY-PUSH; CITIZENS; PERSPECTIVES; INNOVATION; FRAMEWORK; CADASTRE; SENSORS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3390/ijgi6070186
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Land information is one of the basic requirements for land management activities such as land consolidation. However, the dearth of land information on customary lands limits the development and application of land consolidation. This paper presents and discusses the results of an experiment carried out to test the potential of participatory land administration applied on customary lands in support of land consolidation. A brief overview of the evolution of crowdsourced, voluntary, and participatory approaches is provided alongside newly related insights into neogeography and neo-cadastre, and fit-for-purpose and pro-poor land administration. The concept of participatory land administration is then developed in this context. The area of the experiment is in Northern Ghana where the process was developed together with the local farming community. The study involved collecting land information relating to farms over a two-week period, using a mobile app and a satellite image, based on participatory land administration. The results show that Participatory Land Administration can potentially support land consolidation, though further investigation is needed on how it can be integrated into the formal land registration system, into an actual land consolidation project.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Land consolidation, customary lands, and Ghana's Northern Savannah Ecological Zone: An evaluation of the possibilities and pitfalls [J].
Abubakari, Z. ;
van der Molen, P. ;
Bennett, R. M. ;
Kuusaana, E. D. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 54 :386-398
[2]  
AfDB, LAND TEN REG RWAND G
[3]   Living Labs: arbiters of mid- and ground-level innovation [J].
Almirall, Esteve ;
Wareham, Jonathan .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2011, 23 (01) :87-102
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, LANDMAPP LANDMAPP UN
[5]  
[Anonymous], COMP STUDY LAND ADM
[6]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[7]   An assessment of a collaborative mapping approach for exploring land use patterns for several European metropolises [J].
Arsanjani, Jamal Jokar ;
Vaz, Eric .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2015, 35 :329-337
[8]  
Asiama K. O., 2015, P JOINT WORKSH FIG C
[9]  
Asiama K.O., 2017, American Journal of Rural Development, V5, P39, DOI [10.12691/ajrd-5-2-2, DOI 10.12691/AJRD-5-2-2]
[10]  
Asiama K. O., 2015, P LANDAC INT C LAND