A CTC(M-1) Model for Different Types of Raters

被引：37

作者：

Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. ^{[1
]}

Eid, Michael ^{[2
]}

Geiser, Christian ^{[2
]}

Courvoisier, Delphine S. ^{[3
]}

Lischetzke, Tanja ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Psychol, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland

[2] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Psychol, D-1000 Berlin, Germany

[3] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Dept Epidemiol, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland

来源：

METHODOLOGY-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES | 2009年 / 5卷 / 03期

关键词：

multitrait-multimethod analysis; structural equation modeling; convergent and discriminant validity; method effects; interchangeable raters; MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD DATA; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; CT-C(M-1) MODEL; PERSONALITY; SELF; CONVERGENT; VARIABLES; ACCURACY; BEHAVIOR; TRAITS;

D O I：

10.1027/1614-2241.5.3.88

中图分类号：

O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;

摘要：

Many psychologists collect multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) data to assess the convergent and discriminant validity of psychological measures. In order to choose the most appropriate model, the types of methods applied have to be considered. It is shown how the combination of interchangeable and structurally different raters can be analyzed with an extension of the correlated trait-correlated method minus one [CTC(M-1)] model. This extension allows for disentangling individual rater biases (unique method effects) from shared rater biases (common method effects). The basic ideas of this model are presented and illustrated by an empirical example.

引用

页码：88 / 98

页数：11

共 21 条

[1]

BURNS GL, 2006, HDB MULTIMETHOD MEAS

[2] CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].

CAMPBELL, DT ;

FISKE, DW .

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105

[3] JUDGABLE PEOPLE - PERSONALITY, BEHAVIOR, AND COMPETING EXPLANATIONS [J].

COLVIN, CR .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 64 (05) :861-873

[4] Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along? [J].

Curran, PJ .

MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2003, 38 (04) :529-568

[5] A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions [J].

Eid, M .

PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2000, 65 (02) :241-261

[6] Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models:: A multiple-indicator CT-C(M-1) model [J].

Eid, M ;

Lischetzke, T ;

Nussbeck, FW ;

Trierweiler, LI .

PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (01) :38-60

[7]

Eid M., 2006, Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology, P283, DOI [DOI 10.1037/11383-000, 10.1037/11383-020, DOI 10.1037/11383-020]

[8] Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: Different models for different types of methods [J].

Eid, Michael ;

Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. ;

Geiser, Christian ;

Cole, David A. ;

Gollwitzer, Mario ;

Lischetzke, Tanja .

PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2008, 13 (03) :230-253

[9] ON THE ACCURACY OF PERSONALITY JUDGMENT - A REALISTIC APPROACH [J].

FUNDER, DC .

PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1995, 102 (04) :652-670

[10] On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model:: A comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006) [J].

Geiser, Christian ;

Eid, Michael ;

Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. .

PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2008, 13 (01) :49-57

← 1 2 3 →