A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects

被引:503
作者
Riley, Patrick O.
Paolini, Gabriele
Della Croce, Ugo
Paylo, Kate W.
Kerrigan, D. Casey
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept PM&R, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[2] Univ Sassari, Dept Biomed Sci, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
关键词
gait; kinematics; kinetics; treadmill; overground; GROUND REACTION FORCES; SPEED; YOUNG; GAIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.003
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Gait evaluation protocols using instrumented treadmills will be increasingly used in the near future. For this reason, it must be shown that using instrumented treadmills will produce measures of the ground reaction force adequate for inverse dynamic analysis, and differences between treadmill and overground gait must be well characterized. Methods: Overground walking kinetics were estimated with the subjects walking at their self-selected comfortable walking speed. For the treadmill gait trials, the subjects walked on two treadmills, such that heel-strike occurred on the forward treadmill and toe-off occurred on the trailing treadmill. The treadmill was set to the average overground walking speed. Overground and treadmill data were evaluated using Vicon Plug-in Gait. The differences between the maxima and minima of kinematic and kinetic parameters for overground and treadmill gait were evaluated. Results: The kinematics of treadmill and overground gait were very similar. Twelve of 22 kinematic parameter maxima were statistically significantly different (p < 0.05), but the magnitude of the difference was generally less than 2 degrees. All GRF maxima were found to be statistically significantly smaller for treadmill versus overground gait (p < 0.05) as were 15 of 18 moment, and 3 of 6 power maxima. However, the magnitude of the differences was comparable to the variability in normal gait parameters. The sagittal plane ankle moments were not statistically different for treadmill and overground gait. Discussion: We have shown that treadmill gait is qualitatively and quantitatively similar to overground gait. Differences in kinematic and kinetic parameters can be detected in matched comparisons, particularly in the case of kinetic parameters. However, the magnitudes of these differences are all within the range of repeatability of measured kinematic parameters. Thus, the mechanics of treadmill and overground gait are very similar. Clinical significance: Having demonstrated the essential equivalence of treadmill and overground gait, it is now possible for clinical movement analysis to take advantage of treadmill-based protocols. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 24
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking [J].
Alton, F ;
Baldey, L ;
Caplan, S ;
Morrissey, MC .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 13 (06) :434-440
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1249/00005768-198024000-00005
[3]   A treadmill ergometer for three-dimensional ground reaction forces measurement during walking [J].
Belli, A ;
Bui, P ;
Berger, A ;
Geyssant, A ;
Lacour, JR .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 34 (01) :105-112
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   A force measuring treadmill in clinical gait analysis [J].
Dierick, F ;
Penta, M ;
Renaut, D ;
Detrembleur, C .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2004, 20 (03) :299-303
[6]  
ELLIOTT BC, 1976, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V8, P84
[7]  
HUGHES CH, 2005, REPEATABILITY KNEE D
[8]   NORMAL GAIT OF YOUNG AND OLD MEN AND WOMEN - GROUND REACTION FORCE MEASUREMENT ON A TREADMILL [J].
JANSEN, EC ;
VITTAS, D ;
HELLBERG, S ;
HANSEN, J .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 53 (02) :193-196
[9]   A TREADMILL-MOUNTED FORCE PLATFORM [J].
KRAM, R ;
POWELL, AJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 67 (04) :1692-1698
[10]   Force treadmill for measuring vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces [J].
Kram, R ;
Griffin, TM ;
Donelan, JM ;
Chang, YH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 85 (02) :764-769