Clinical Aspects of Palliative Sedation in Prospective Studies. A Systematic Review

被引:57
作者
Arantzamendi, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Belar, Alazne [1 ,2 ]
Payne, Sheila [3 ]
Rijpstra, Maaike [4 ]
Preston, Nancy [3 ]
Menten, Johan [5 ]
Van der Elst, Michael [5 ]
Radbruch, Lukas [6 ]
Hasselaar, Jeroen [4 ]
Centeno, Carlos [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, ATLANTES, Inst Cultura & Soc, Pamplona, Spain
[2] IdISNA, Pamplona, Spain
[3] Univ Lancaster, Div Hlth Res, Lancaster, England
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Anaesthesiol, Pain,Palliat Med, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Oncol, Lab Expt Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium
[6] Univ Klinikum Bonn, Dept Palliat Med, Bonn, Germany
[7] Clin Univ Navarra, Dept Med Paliat, Pamplona, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Palliative sedation; sedation; deep sedation; palliative medicine; palliative care; terminal care; terminally ill; hospice care; systematic review; prospective studies; TERMINALLY-ILL PATIENTS; CANCER-PATIENTS; OBSERVATIONAL SCALES; UNTIL DEATH; CARE-UNITS; PHYSICIANS; NURSES; LIFE; HOME; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.022
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context: Near the end of life when patients experience refractory symptoms, palliative sedation may be considered as a last treatment. Clinical guidelines have been developed, but they are mainly based on expert opinion or retrospective chart reviews. Therefore, evidence for the clinical aspects of palliative sedation is needed. Objectives: To explore clinical aspects of palliative sedation in recent prospective studies. Methods: Systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered at PROSPERO. PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched (January 2014-December 2019), combining sedation, palliative care, and prospective. Article quality was assessed. Results: Ten prospective articles were included, involving predominantly patients with cancer. Most frequently reported refractory symptoms were delirium (41%-83%), pain (25%-65%), and dyspnea (16%-59%). In some articles, psychological and existential distress were mentioned (16%-59%). Only a few articles specified the tools used to assess symptoms. Level of sedation assessment tools were the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, Ramsay Sedation Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale, and Bispectral Index monitoring. The palliative sedation practice shows an underlying need for proportionality in relation to symptom intensity. Midazolam was the main sedative used. Other reported medications were phenobarbital, promethazine, and anesthetic medication-propofol. The only study that reported level of patient's discomfort as a palliative sedation outcome showed a decrease in patient discomfort. Conclusion: Assessment of refractory symptoms should include physical evaluation with standardized tools applied and interviews for psychological and existential evaluation by expert clinicians working in teams. Future research needs to evaluate the effectiveness of palliative sedation for refractory symptom relief. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / +
页数:24
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Quality of Care in Palliative Sedation: Audit and Compliance Monitoring of a Clinical Protocol
    Angel Benitez-Rosario, Miguel
    Castillo-Padros, Manuel
    Garrido-Bernet, Belen
    Ascanio-Leon, Belen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2012, 44 (04) : 532 - 541
  • [2] [Anonymous], CASP Checklists
  • [3] Arantzamendi M, PROSPERO
  • [4] Correlation Between Observational Scales of Sedation and Comfort and Bispectral Index Scores
    Barbato, Michael
    Barclay, Greg
    Potter, Jan
    Yeo, Wilf
    Chung, Joseph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2017, 54 (02) : 186 - 193
  • [5] Palliative pharmacological sedation for terminally ill adults
    Beller, E. M.
    van Driel, M. L.
    McGregor, L.
    Truong, S.
    Mitchell, G.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (01):
  • [6] Medication Kits for Managing Symptomatic Emergencies in the Home: A Survey of Common Hospice Practice
    Bishop, Margaret F.
    Stephens, Lisa
    Goodrich, Martha
    Byock, Ira
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 12 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [7] Physicians' and pharmacists' attitudes toward the use of sedation at the end of life: Influence of prognosis and type of suffering
    Blondeau, D
    Roy, L
    Dumont, S
    Godin, G
    Martineau, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2005, 21 (04) : 238 - 245
  • [8] The use of observational scales to monitor symptom control and depth of sedation in patients requiring palliative sedation: A systematic review
    Brinkkemper, Tijn
    van Norel, Arjanne M.
    Szadek, Karolina M.
    Loer, Stephan A.
    Zuurmond, Wouter W. A.
    Perez, Roberto S. G. M.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 27 (01) : 54 - 67
  • [9] Broeckaert Bert., 2002, The Ethics of Palliative Care: European Perspective, P166
  • [10] Perception of discomfort by relatives and nurses in unresponsive terminally ill patients with cancer: A prospective study
    Bruera, E
    Sweeney, C
    Willey, J
    Palmer, JL
    Strasser, F
    Strauch, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2003, 26 (03) : 818 - 826