Challenges encountered when expanding activated sludge models: a case study based on N2O production

被引:15
作者
Snip, L. J. P. [1 ]
Boiocchi, R. [1 ]
Flores-Alsina, X. [1 ,2 ]
Jeppsson, U. [2 ]
Gernaey, K. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Chem & Biochem Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Biomed Engn BME, Div Ind Elect Engn & Automat IEA, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
carbon footprint; greenhouse gas emissions; good modelling practice; model upgrade; model coupling; NITROUS-OXIDE PRODUCTION; AMMONIA-OXIDIZING BACTERIA; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; DENITRIFICATION; NITRIFICATION; EMISSIONS; OXIDATION; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2014.347
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is common practice in wastewater engineering to extend standard activated sludge models (ASMs) with extra process equations derived from batch experiments. However, such experiments have often been performed under conditions different from the ones normally found in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). As a consequence, these experiments might not be representative for full-scale performance, and unexpected behaviour may be observed when simulating WWTP models using the derived process equations. In this paper we want to highlight problems encountered using a simplified case study: a modified version of the Activated Sludge Model No. 1 (ASM1) is upgraded with nitrous oxide (N2O) formation by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Four different model structures have been implemented in the Benchmark Simulation Model No. 1 (BSM1). The results of the investigations revealed two typical difficulties: problems related to the overall mathematical model structure and problems related to the published set of parameter values. The paper describes the model implementation incompatibilities, the variability in parameter values and the difficulties of reaching similar conditions when simulating a full-scale activated sludge plant. Finally, the simulation results show large differences in oxygen uptake rates, nitritation rates and consequently the quantity of N2O emission (G(N2O)) using the different models.
引用
收藏
页码:1251 / 1260
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Nitrous oxide emissions and dissolved oxygen profiling in a full-scale nitrifying activated sludge treatment plant [J].
Aboobakar, Amina ;
Cartmell, Elise ;
Stephenson, Tom ;
Jones, Mark ;
Vale, Peter ;
Dotro, Gabriela .
WATER RESEARCH, 2013, 47 (02) :524-534
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 23 IWA
[3]   Reliability of parameter estimation in respirometric models [J].
Checchi, N ;
Marsili-Libelli, S .
WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (15) :3686-3696
[4]  
Copp J.B., 2002, The COST simulation benchmark-Description and simulator manual
[5]   Comparison of different modeling approaches to better evaluate greenhouse gas emissions from whole wastewater treatment plants [J].
Corominas, Lluis ;
Flores-Alsina, Xavier ;
Snip, Laura ;
Vanrolleghem, Peter A. .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2012, 109 (11) :2854-2863
[6]   Nitrous oxide generation in full-scale biological nutrient removal wastewater treatment plants [J].
Foley, Jeffrey ;
de Haas, David ;
Yuan, Zhiguo ;
Lant, Paul .
WATER RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (03) :831-844
[7]   A systematic approach for model verification: application on seven published activated sludge models [J].
Hauduc, H. ;
Rieger, L. ;
Takacs, I. ;
Heduit, A. ;
Vanrolleghem, P. A. ;
Gillot, S. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (04) :825-839
[8]  
Henze M., 2000, ACTIVATED SLUDGE MOD, DOI DOI 10.2166/9781780402369
[9]   An Updated Process Model for Carbon Oxidation, Nitrification, and Denitrification [J].
Hiatt, William C. ;
Grady, C. P. Leslie, Jr. .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2008, 80 (11) :2145-2156
[10]   Nitrous oxide emission during wastewater treatment [J].
Kampschreur, Marlies J. ;
Temmink, Hardy ;
Kleerebezem, Robbert ;
Jetten, Mike S. M. ;
van Loosdrecht, Mark C. M. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (17) :4093-4103