Total Breast Reconstruction Using Autologous Fat Grafting Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Irradiated and Non-irradiated Patients

被引:36
|
作者
Longo, Benedetto [1 ]
Laporta, Rosaria [1 ]
Sorotos, Michail [1 ]
Pagnoni, Marco [1 ]
Gentilucci, Marika [1 ]
Santanelli di Pompeo, Fabio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Sch Med & Psychol, St Andrea Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, I-00189 Rome, Italy
关键词
Autologous fat transfer; Autologous breast reconstruction; Nipple-sparing mastectomy; Fat grafting; Lipofilling; RADIATION-THERAPY; COMPLICATIONS; CARCINOMA; AGREEMENT; SAFETY; BRAVA; FLAP;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-014-0406-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although autologous microvascular reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is considered one of the best reconstructive choices, this procedure cannot be offered to all patients. The aim of this study was to define a fat grafting protocol for successful reconstruction following NSM and to assess its reliability in irradiated and non-irradiated patients. Twenty-one patients were prospectively enrolled and stratified in Group-A (11 non-irradiated) and Group-B (10 irradiated) NSMs comparing clinical and aesthetic outcomes. A fat grafting protocol was used to standardize the procedure. Continuous and categorical variables were analysed using the Student t test and the Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively. A value of p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The groups were homogeneous in terms of demographics (p > 0.05), while number of sessions, mean volume of the first two treatments, and overall injected volume showed significant differences (p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p = 0.002). Volume, shape, position of the breast mound, IMF and scar location subscales obtained high score evaluations without a significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05), whereas the skin texture subscale showed a lower score evaluation in Group-B than in Group-A (p = 0.001). Although a significant difference for total subscales was in favour of Group-A (p = 0.001), the global score had a high rate evaluation in both groups (p = 0.132). Inter-rater reliability showed substantial agreement among all categories, total and global scores. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective series of fat transfer reconstructions following NSM using a systematic approach. Although further studies are required, it may be considered an effective option whenever flap reconstruction cannot be performed.
引用
收藏
页码:1101 / 1108
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Patients with Breast Cancer
    Kandice K. Ludwig
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2021, 13 : 35 - 41
  • [32] Patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy with intraoperative radiotherapy and breast reconstruction for breast cancer
    Zhang, Xiaoshen
    Liu, Jinhui
    Pan, Lingxiao
    Zheng, Wenbo
    Chen, Lun
    Tang, Wei
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2023, 123 (02) : 110 - 117
  • [33] Expanded Indications for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 60 Years
    King, Caroline A.
    Shaposhnik, Guy
    Sayyed, Adaah A.
    Bartholomew, Alex J.
    Bozzuto, Laura M.
    Sosin, Michael
    Greenwalt, Ian T.
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    Song, David
    Tousimis, Eleni A.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 92 (03) : 279 - 284
  • [34] Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictive factors of adverse surgical outcomes in Asian patients
    Su, Chun-Lin
    Yang, Jia-Ruei
    Kuo, Wen-Ling
    Chen, Shin-Cheh
    Cheong, David Chon-Fok
    Huang, Jung-Ju
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2021, 48 (05): : 483 - 493
  • [35] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Free-Flap Reconstruction in the Large Ptotic Breast
    Schneider, Lisa F.
    Chen, Constance M.
    Stolier, Alan J.
    Shapiro, Richard L.
    Ahn, Christina Y.
    Allen, Robert J.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 69 (04) : 425 - 428
  • [36] Breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy in the large and/or ptotic breast: A systematic review of indications, techniques, and outcomes
    Tondu, Thierry
    Hubens, Guy
    Tjalma, Wiebren A. A.
    Thiessen, Filip E. F.
    Vrints, Ina
    Van Thielen, Jana
    Verhoeven, Veronique
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2020, 73 (03) : 469 - 485
  • [37] Reverse Expansion Following Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A Natural, Safe and Effective Autologous Technique for Breast Reconstruction
    Lucattelli, Elena
    Cattin, Federico
    Cipriani, Federico
    Dellachiesa, Laura
    Fogacci, Tommaso
    Frisoni, Gianluca
    Samorani, Domenico
    Semprini, Gloria
    Fabiocchi, Luca
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 46 (04) : 1602 - 1608
  • [38] Autologous reconstruction following nipple sparing mastectomy: a comprehensive review of the current literature
    Shay, Paul
    Jacobs, Jordan
    GLAND SURGERY, 2018, 7 (03) : 316 - 324
  • [39] A Novel Technique for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction in Patients with Macromastia
    Broer, Niclas
    Narayan, Deepak
    Lannin, Donnald
    Grube, Baiba
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 126 (02) : 89E - 92E
  • [40] Psychosocial and Sexual Well-Being Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction
    Wei, Cindy H.
    Scott, Amie M.
    Price, Alison N.
    Miller, Helen Catherine
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Jhanwar, Sabrina M.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Disa, Joseph J.
    McCarthy, Colleen
    Matros, Evan
    Cordeiro, Peter G.
    Sacchini, Virgilio
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (01) : 10 - 17