Ethical and legal questions of anonymity and confidentiality in gamete donation

被引:3
|
作者
Riano-Galan, Isolina [1 ]
Martinez Gonzalez, Carmen [2 ]
Gallego Riestra, Sergio [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oviedo, Hosp Univ Cent Asturias HUCA, AGC Pediatria, IUOPA Dept Med ISPA,CIBERESP, Oviedo, Spain
[2] Ctr Salud Villablanca, Madrid, Spain
[3] Consejeria Salud Principado Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
来源
ANALES DE PEDIATRIA | 2021年 / 94卷 / 05期
关键词
Assisted reproduction techniques; Anonymity; Gamete donors; Confidentiality; Registries; Bioethics; Pediatrics;
D O I
10.1016/j.anpedi.2021.02.008
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Spain is the European country where more assisted reproduction techniques (ART) are performed, reaching 9% of newborns. The objective of this article is to introduce the legal framework and to analyze some ethical questions, not without controversy, in relation to the anonymity of gamete donors and the concealment of origin by ART from their children. Spanish legislation establishes the relative anonymity of donors: both gamete recipients and born children have the right to obtain general information about them as long as their identity is not included, but in situations of risk to the life and health of the children allows your bankruptcy. Likewise, an unequivocal right to privacy and confidentiality of submission to the ART is established. The movement aimed at introducing in our country a legislative amendment that ends the anonymity of gamete donors is based on the right of those children to know their biological origin. Along with legal changes, the attitude of parents and professionals must gradually change towards more transparent and responsible communication, based on the experiences of adults conceived by these techniques, and those adopted. Building values such as trust and truth in the family relationships from responsibility requires placing the children, largely forgotten and the most vulnerable part, at the center of the debate. (C) 2021 Asociacion Espanola de Pediatria. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Confidentiality and managed care - Ethical and legal concerns
    Davidson, JR
    Davidson, T
    HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 1996, 21 (03) : 208 - 215
  • [12] The principle of gamete donor anonymity in its social context. An analysis of the legal theories of identity
    Brunet, L.
    BASIC AND CLINICAL ANDROLOGY, 2010, 20 : 92 - 102
  • [13] Psychologists' perceptions of legal and ethical requirements for breaching confidentiality
    Kampf, Annegret
    McSherry, Bernadette
    Thomas, Stuart
    Abrahams, Helen
    AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2008, 43 (03) : 194 - 204
  • [14] Anonymity and Confidentiality in Secure Distributed Simulation
    Magnani, Antonio
    D'Angelo, Gabriele
    Ferretti, Stefano
    Marzolla, Moreno
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 IEEE/ACM 22ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DISTRIBUTED SIMULATION AND REAL TIME APPLICATIONS (DS-RT), 2018, : 71 - 78
  • [15] Anonymity, Access and Information Sharing in Gamete Donation in Portugal: What Are the Views of Reproductive Medicine Professionals?
    Silva, Susana
    Samorinha, Catarina
    de Freitas, Claudia
    ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2019, 32 (03): : 246 - +
  • [16] The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business
    Harper, Joyce C.
    Kennett, Debbie
    Reisel, Dan
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (06) : 1135 - 1140
  • [17] Gamete and embryo donation
    Shenfield F.
    Pennings G.
    Sureau C.
    Cohen J.
    Devroey P.
    Tarlatzis B.
    Kentenich H.
    Gynäkologische Endokrinologie, 2007, 5 (3) : 171 - 173
  • [18] Gamete and embryo donation
    Kentenich, H.
    GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE, 2007, 5 (03): : 171 - 173
  • [19] Talking about suicide: Confidentiality and anonymity in qualitative research
    Gibson, Susanne
    Benson, Outi
    Brand, Sarah L.
    NURSING ETHICS, 2013, 20 (01) : 18 - 29
  • [20] Evaluation of anonymity and confidentiality protocols using theorem proving
    Mhamdi, Tarek
    Hasan, Osman
    Tahar, Sofiene
    FORMAL METHODS IN SYSTEM DESIGN, 2015, 47 (03) : 265 - 286