Test-Retest Reliability of Traumatic Brain Injury Outcome Measures: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study

被引:75
作者
Bogner, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Whiteneck, Gale G. [2 ]
MacDonald, Jessica [1 ]
Juengst, Shannon B. [3 ]
Brown, Allen W. [4 ]
Philippus, Angela M. [2 ]
Marwitz, Jennifer H. [6 ]
Lengenfelder, Jeannie [5 ]
Mellick, Dave [2 ]
Arenth, Patricia [3 ]
Corrigan, John D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Craig Hosp Res Dept, Englewood, CO USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Kessler Fdn, E Hanover, NJ USA
[6] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
关键词
brain injuries; psychometrics; test-retest reliability; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; DISABILITY RATING-SCALE; INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT; FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM; TBI IDENTIFICATION METHOD; SAMPLE-SIZE REQUIREMENTS; LIFE SCALE; STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; VALIDITY; KAPPA;
D O I
10.1097/HTR.0000000000000291
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Evaluate the test-retest reliability of measures that comprise the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems follow-up data set. Participants: A total of 224 persons with a moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) enrolled in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database. Design: Following standard administration of the follow-up interview, a second interview was administered 14 to 28 days later using the same interviewer and the same mode of administration. Main Measures: Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems follow-up interview that includes 66 variables comprised (a) single item measures of demographics; employment; general health as well as specific health conditions; rehospitalization; tobacco, alcohol, and other drug use; transportation; and mental health and (b) multi-item instruments: FIM; Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools-Objective; Disability Rating Scale; Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended; Supervision Rating Scale; Satisfaction With Life Scale; TBI Quality of Life Anxiety and Depression items; and The Ohio State University TBI Identification Method. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged from 0.65 to 0.99, weighted kappa values ranged from 0.54 to 0.99, and kappa values ranged from 0.43 to 1.00. Four kappa/weighted kappa estimates fell below 0.60: arrested, psychiatric hospitalization, number of days not in good physical health, and rating of general emotional health. Conclusions: With few exceptions, good to excellent test-retest reliability estimates were obtained. The findings support the use of these measures in prior and future studies and indicate that persons with moderate-severe TBI can provide reliable self-report.
引用
收藏
页码:E1 / E16
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Retest reliability of surveillance questions on health related quality of life [J].
Andresen, EM ;
Catlin, TK ;
Wyrwich, KW ;
Jackson-Thompson, J .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2003, 57 (05) :339-343
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MEAS HLTH DAYS
[3]   Supervision rating scale: A measure of functional outcome from brain injury [J].
Boake, C .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 77 (08) :765-772
[4]   Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method With Prisoners [J].
Bogner, Jennifer ;
Corrigan, John D. .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2009, 24 (04) :279-291
[5]   The validity and reliability of an interactive computer tobacco and alcohol use survey in general practice [J].
Bonevski, B. ;
Campbell, E. ;
Sanson-Fisher, R. W. .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2010, 35 (05) :492-498
[6]  
BROWNSON RC, 1994, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V5, P545
[7]   Sample-size calculations for Cohen's kappa [J].
Cantor, AB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1996, 1 (02) :150-153
[8]   Reliability of self-reported willingness-to-pay and annual income in patients treated for toenail onychomycosis [J].
Cham, P. M. H. ;
Chen, S. C. ;
Grill, J. P. ;
Jonk, Y. C. ;
Warshaw, E. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 156 (05) :922-928
[9]   The precision of reliability and validity estimates re-visited: Distinguishing between clinical and statistical significance of sample size requirements [J].
Cicchetti, DV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 23 (05) :695-700
[10]   HIGH AGREEMENT BUT LOW KAPPA .2. RESOLVING THE PARADOXES [J].
CICCHETTI, DV ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (06) :551-558