Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Pancreas at 3T

被引:41
|
作者
Itoh, Yohei [1 ]
Takehara, Yasuo [2 ]
Kawase, Toshihiro [3 ]
Terashima, Kenichi [4 ]
Ohkawa, Yoshihisa [5 ]
Hirose, Yuko [1 ]
Koda, Ai [1 ]
Hyodo, Naoko [1 ]
Ushio, Takasuke [1 ]
Hirai, Yuki [1 ]
Yoshizawa, Nobuko [1 ]
Yamashita, Shuhei [1 ]
Nasu, Hatsuko [1 ]
Ohishi, Naoki [2 ]
Sakahara, Harumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamamatsu Univ, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol & Nucl Med, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
[2] Hamamatsu Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 4313192, Japan
[3] Chutoen Gen Med Ctr, Dept Radiol Technol, Kakegawa, Japan
[4] GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Chutoen Gen Med Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Kakegawa, Japan
关键词
MR ELASTOGRAPHY; FIBROSIS; STIFFNESS; DIAGNOSIS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.24995
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: 1) To assess the usefulness of an elastic belt bracing the upper abdomen for reducing the miscalculated areas of the pancreas on 3.0T magnetic resonance elastography (MRE); 2) to test whether MRE can detect difference of stiffness between normal pancreas and the focal pancreatic diseases. Materials and Methods: Using an initial eight normal volunteers, miscalculated areas were compared between MRE with the elastic belt and without the belt on 3.0T MRI. Then, using the belt, MRE of the normal pancreas was measured using 14 volunteers and 11 patients with focal pancreatic lesions. Results: The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) percentages of correctly calculated areas were 57.4% (32.9-63.0) with the elastic belt and 35.3% (11.4-60.4) without the belt (P=0.0078). The stiffness of each pancreatic segment of the normal volunteers (mean+/-SE) was 2.37+/-0.16 kPa for the head, 2.46+/-0.17 kPa for the body, and 2.58+/-0.26 kPa for the tail. The stiffness of seven pancreatic cancers was 6.06+/-0.49 kPa, which was higher than the overall pancreatic stiffness of the normal volunteers (2.47+/-0.11 kPa, P < 0.0001). Stiffness of the pancreatic lesions in the head of 6.03+/-0.42 kPa, body of 5.57+/-0.82 kPa, and tail of 5.9+/-1.9 kPa were also higher than those of corresponding segments of the normal volunteers (P=0.0011, 0.0029, and 0.029, respectively). Conclusion: With the elastic belt, miscalculation of the pancreatic stiffness was reduced. MRE showed differences of stiffness between normal pancreas and pancreatic lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 390
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for measurement of muscle stiffness of the shoulder: feasibility with a 3T MRI system
    Hong, Sun Hwa
    Hong, Suk-Joo
    Yoon, Joon-Shik
    Oh, Chang-Hyun
    Cha, Jang Gyu
    Kim, Hee Kyung
    Bolster, Bradley, Jr.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2016, 57 (09) : 1099 - 1106
  • [2] Preliminary experience with 3T magnetic resonance elastography imaging of the liver
    Joshi, Anagha
    Muthe, Mridula M.
    Firke, Vikrant
    Badgujar, Harshal
    SA JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 25 (01):
  • [3] Comparison of motion encoding waveforms for magnetic resonance elastography at 3T
    Dunn, Timothy C.
    Majumdar, Sharmila
    2005 27TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7, 2005, : 7405 - 7408
  • [4] Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) of the Pancreas, a Feasibility Study in Healthy Volunteers
    Decker, G. Anton
    Glaser, Kevin J.
    Miller, Laurence J.
    Pannala, Rahul
    Faigel, Douglas O.
    Nguyen, Cuong C.
    Collins, Joseph M.
    Ehman, Richard L.
    Silva, Alvin C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (05) : S458 - S458
  • [5] Clinical 3T Magnetic Resonance
    Bradley, William G., Jr.
    NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 20 (03): : 381 - 382
  • [6] Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Urography at 3T: Clinical Feasibility
    Childs, David D.
    Leyendecker, John R.
    Gianini, John
    Hall, Craig
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [7] Magnetic resonance elastography: Feasibility of liver stiffness measurements in healthy volunteers at 3 T
    Mannelli, L.
    Godfrey, E.
    Graves, M. J.
    Patterson, A. J.
    Beddy, P.
    Bowden, D.
    Joubert, I.
    Priest, A. N.
    Lomas, D. J.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (03) : 258 - 262
  • [8] Advanced Magnetic Resonance Techniques: 3T
    Bhatti, Lubna
    Hoang, Jenny K.
    Dale, Brian M.
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 53 (03) : 441 - +
  • [9] 3T magnetic resonance imaging of the hypothalamus
    Mills, R. J.
    Young, C. A.
    Smith, T.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 253 : 128 - 128
  • [10] Thirty-two-channel coil 3T magnetic resonance-guided biopsies of prostate tumor suspicious regions identified on multimodality 3T magnetic resonance imaging: Technique and feasibility
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Fuetterer, Juergen J.
    Huisman, Henkjan J.
    Hulsbergen-vandeKaa, Christina
    van Basten, Jean-Paul
    van Oort, Inge
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2008, 43 (10) : 686 - 694