How Reliably Do Eye Parameters Indicate Internal Versus External Attentional Focus?

被引:24
作者
Annerer-Walcher, Sonja [1 ]
Ceh, Simon M. [1 ]
Putze, Felix [2 ]
Kampen, Marvin [2 ]
Korner, Christof [1 ]
Benedek, Mathias [1 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Psychol, Univ Pl 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[2] Univ Bremen, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Bremen, Germany
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Internally directed cognition; Internal attentional focus; Eye behavior; Pupillometry; Microsaccades; Fixation disparity; LSTM; Machine learning; WANDERING MIND; BEHAVIOR; PUPILLOMETRY; BLINKING; LOOKING; AROUSAL;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.12977
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Eye behavior is increasingly used as an indicator of internal versus external focus of attention both in research and application. However, available findings are partly inconsistent, which might be attributed to the different nature of the employed types of internal and external cognition tasks. The present study, therefore, investigated how consistently different eye parameters respond to internal versus external attentional focus across three task modalities: numerical, verbal, and visuo-spatial. Three eye parameters robustly differentiated between internal and external attentional focus across all tasks. Blinks, pupil diameter variance, and fixation disparity variance were consistently increased during internally directed attention. We also observed substantial attentional focus effects on other parameters (pupil diameter, fixation disparity, saccades, and microsaccades), but they were moderated by task type. Single-trial analysis of our data using machine learning techniques further confirmed our results: Classifying the focus of attention by means of eye tracking works well across participants, but generalizing across tasks proves to be challenging. Based on the effects of task type on eye parameters, we discuss what eye parameters are best suited as indicators of internal versus external attentional focus in different settings.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Abadi M, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF OSDI'16: 12TH USENIX SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, P265
  • [2] Towards Predicting Reading Comprehension From Gaze Behavior
    Ahn, Seoyoung
    Kelton, Conor
    Balasubramanian, Aruna
    Zelinsky, Gregory
    [J]. ETRA 2020 SHORT PAPERS: ACM SYMPOSIUM ON EYE TRACKING RESEARCH & APPLICATIONS, 2020,
  • [3] Lost in Style: Gaze-driven Adaptive Aid for VR Navigation
    Alghofaili, Rawan
    Sawahata, Yasuhito
    Huang, Haikun
    Wang, Hsueh-Cheng
    Shiratori, Takaaki
    Yu, Lap-Fai
    [J]. CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [4] Eye behavior predicts susceptibility to visual distraction during internally directed cognition
    Annerer-Walcher, Sonja
    Koerner, Christof
    Beaty, Roger E.
    Benedek, Mathias
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (07) : 3432 - 3444
  • [5] Eye behavior does not adapt to expected visual distraction during internally directed cognition
    Annerer-Walcher, Sonja
    Koerner, Christof
    Benedek, Mathias
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (09):
  • [6] Deep learning
    LeCun, Yann
    Bengio, Yoshua
    Hinton, Geoffrey
    [J]. NATURE, 2015, 521 (7553) : 436 - 444
  • [7] Long short-term memory
    Hochreiter, S
    Schmidhuber, J
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1997, 9 (08) : 1735 - 1780
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2020, NumPy
  • [9] Core Network Contributions to Remembering the Past, Imagining the Future, and Thinking Creatively
    Beaty, Roger E.
    Thakral, Preston P.
    Madore, Kevin P.
    Benedek, Mathias
    Schacter, Daniel L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 30 (12) : 1939 - 1951
  • [10] Eye Behavior Associated with Internally versus Externally Directed Cognition
    Benedek, Mathias
    Stoiser, Robert
    Walcher, Sonja
    Koerner, Christof
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8