Forest law enforcement in the Brazilian Amazon: Costs and income effects

被引:78
作者
Boerner, J. [1 ,2 ]
Wunder, S. [2 ]
Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. [3 ]
Hyman, G. [4 ]
Nascimento, N. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Res Dev Ctr, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
[2] Ctr Int Forestry Res CIFOR, BR-2221001 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Minist Foreign Affairs & Int Dev, Paris, France
[4] CIAT, Cali, Colombia
[5] Environm Consultant, Belem, Para, Brazil
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2014年 / 29卷
关键词
Environmental policy mix; Forest conservation; Spatial enforcement model; Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD plus ); DEFORESTATION; CONSERVATION; PAYMENTS; REDD;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite recent success in reducing forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon, additional forest conservation efforts, for example, through 'Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation' (REDD+), could significantly contribute to global climate-change mitigation. Economic incentives, such as payments for environmental services could promote conservation, but deforestation often occurs on land without crucial tenure-security prerequisites. Improving the enforcement of existing regulatory disincentives thus represents an important element of Brazil's anti-deforestation action plan. However, conservation law enforcement costs and benefits have been much less studied than for conditional payments. We develop a conceptual framework and a spatially explicit model to analyze field-based regulatory enforcement in the Brazilian Amazon. We validate our model, based on historical deforestation and enforcement mission data from 2003 to 2008. By simulating the current conservation law enforcement practice, we analyze the costs of liability establishment and legal coercion for alternative conservation targets, and evaluate corresponding income impacts. Our findings suggest that spatial patterns of both deforestation and inspection costs markedly influence enforcement patterns and their income effects. Field-based enforcement is a highly cost-effective forest conservation instrument from a regulator's point of view, but comes at high opportunity costs for land users. Payments for environmental services could compensate costs, but will increase budget outlays vis-A-vis a command-and-control dominated strategy. Both legal and institutional challenges have to be overcome to make conservation payments work at a larger scale. Decision-makers may have to innovatively combine incentive and disincentive-based policy instruments in order to make tropical forest conservation both financially viable and socially compatible. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 305
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Spatial modeling of extraction and enforcement in developing country protected areas
    Albers, H. J.
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (02) : 165 - 179
  • [2] Andersen L.E., 2002, DYNAMICS DEFORESTATI, DOI 10.1017/cbo9780511493454
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, DOES CREDIT AFFECT D
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, REALISING REDD NATL
  • [5] Assuncao J., 2012, DEFORESTATION SLOWDO, V3
  • [6] Assuncao Juliano., 2017, DETERRING DEFORESTAT, P36
  • [7] CRIME AND PUNISHMENT - ECONOMIC APPROACH
    BECKER, GS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1968, 76 (02) : 169 - 217
  • [8] Getting REDD to work locally: lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects
    Blom, Benjamin
    Sunderland, Terry
    Murdiyarso, Daniel
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2010, 13 (02) : 164 - 172
  • [9] Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity implications
    Boerner, Jan
    Wunder, Sven
    Wertz-Kanounnikoff, Sheila
    Tito, Marcos Ruegnitz
    Pereira, Ligia
    Nascimento, Nathalia
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (06) : 1272 - 1282
  • [10] Bond I., 2009, INCENTIVE SUSTAIN FO