Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle

被引:285
作者
Akbari, Ata D. [1 ]
Mahmoudi, Seyed M. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tabriz, Fac Mech Engn, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Recompression supercritical CO2 cycle; Exergy analysis; Thermoeconomics; Optimization; WASTE HEAT-RECOVERY; BRAYTON CYCLE; POWER CYCLE; HELIUM; EXERGY; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.037
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Exergoeconomic analysis is reported for a new combined SCRB/ORC (supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle) in which the waste heat from SCRBC (supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle) is utilized by an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for generating electricity. The analysis is also performed for the SCRBC for comparison purposes. Considering eight different working fluids for the ORC, thermodynamic and exergoeconomic models are developed for the cycles through applying mass and energy conservations, exergy balance and exergy cost equations to systems' components. Influences on the SCRB/ORC and SCRBC performances are investigated of the pinch point temperature difference in pre-cooler1 and in condenser, the compressor pressure ratio and the ORC turbine inlet temperature. Using the EES (Engineering Equation Solver) software, the SCRB/ORC performance is optimized thermodynamically and economically. It is concluded that the exergy efficiency of SCRB/ORC is higher than that of the SCRBC by up to 11.7% and that, the total product unit cost of SCRB/ORC is lower than that of the SCRBC by up to 5.7%. The results also indicate that the highest exergy efficiency and the lowest product unit cost for the SCRB/ORC are obtained when Isobutane and RC318 are considered as the ORC working fluid, respectively. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 512
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Angelino G, 1968, 68CT23 ASME
[2]   A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle [J].
Bao, Junjiang ;
Zhao, Li .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 24 :325-342
[3]  
Bejan A, 1996, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM
[4]  
Dostal V, 2004, SUPER CRITICAL CARBO
[5]  
Dostal V., 2004, A Super Critical Carbon Dioxide Cycle
[6]   The supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle: Comparison to other advanced power cycles [J].
Dostal, Vaclav ;
Hejzlar, Pavel ;
Driscoll, Michael J. .
NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 154 (03) :283-301
[7]  
Feher E. G., 1968, Energy Conversion, V8, P85, DOI 10.1016/0013-7480(68)90105-8
[8]   Energy, exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) system with gas turbine prime mover [J].
Ghaebi, Hadi ;
Amidpour, Majid ;
Karimkashi, Shervin ;
Rezayan, Omid .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2011, 35 (08) :697-709
[9]   Waste heat recovery of organic Rankine cycle using dry fluids [J].
Hung, TC .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 42 (05) :539-553
[10]   Study of steam, helium and supercritical CO2 turbine power generations in prototype fusion power reactor [J].
Ishiyama, Shintaro ;
Muto, Yasushi ;
Kato, Yasuyoshi ;
Nishio, Satoshi ;
Hayashi, Takumi ;
Nomoto, Yasunobu .
PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2008, 50 (2-6) :325-332