Detection of areas prone to flood risk using state-of-the-art machine learning models

被引:46
作者
Costache, Romulus [1 ]
Arabameri, Alireza [2 ]
Elkhrachy, Ismail [3 ,4 ]
Ghorbanzadeh, Omid [5 ]
Quoc Bao Pham [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Transilvania Univ Brasov, Dept Civil Engn, Brasov, Romania
[2] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Geomorphol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Najran Univ, Coll Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Najran, Saudi Arabia
[4] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[5] Univ Salzburg, Dept Geoinformat Z GIS, Salzburg, Austria
[6] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Environm Qual Atmospher Sci & Climate Change Res, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[7] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Environm & Labour Safety, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Buzau catchment; flood susceptibility; machine learning; Romania; GIS; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; KERNEL LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; NAIVE BAYES TREE; BIVARIATE STATISTICS; RIVER CATCHMENT; SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT; SPATIAL PREDICTION; POTENTIAL INDEX; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
D O I
10.1080/19475705.2021.1920480
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The present study aims to evaluate the susceptibility to floods in the river basin of Buzau in Romania through the following 6 machine learning models: Support Vector Machine (SVM), J48 decision tree, Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Alternating Decision Tree (ADT). In the first stage of the study, an inventory of the areas affected by floods was made in the study area, and a number of 205 flood points were identified. Further, 12 flood predictors were selected to be used for final susceptibility mapping. The six models' training was performed by using 70% of the total flood points that have been associated with the values of flood predictors. The highest accuracy (0.973) was obtained by the RF model, while J48 had the lowest performance (0.825). Besides, by classifying flood predictors' values in flood and non-flood pixels, the six flood susceptibility maps were made. High and very high flood susceptibility values cover between 17.71% (MLP) and 27.93% (ANFIS) of the study area. The validation of the results, performed using the ROC Curve, shows that the most accurate flood susceptibility values are also assigned to the RF model (AUC = 0.996).
引用
收藏
页码:1488 / 1507
页数:20
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   Influence of seismic incident angle on response uncertainty and structural performance of tall asymmetric structure [J].
Alam, Zeshan ;
Zhang, Chunwei ;
Samali, Bijan .
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2020, 29 (12)
[2]   Experimental and numerical investigation on the complex behaviour of the localised seismic response in a multi-storey plan-asymmetric structure [J].
Alam, Zeshan ;
Sun, Li ;
Zhang, Chunwei ;
Su, Zhongxin ;
Samali, Bijan .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2021, 17 (01) :86-102
[3]   Improving flood risk analysis for effectively supporting the implementation of flood risk management plans: The case study of "Serio" Valley [J].
Albano, Raffaele ;
Mancusi, Leonardo ;
Abbate, Andrea .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2017, 75 :158-172
[4]   GIS-based comparative assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach, naive Bayes tree, bivariate statistics and logistic regression: A case of Topla basin, Slovakia [J].
Ali, Sk Ajim ;
Parvin, Farhana ;
Quoc Bao Pham ;
Vojtek, Matej ;
Vojtekova, Jana ;
Costache, Romulus ;
Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh ;
Hong Quan Nguyen ;
Ahmad, Ateeque ;
Ghorbani, Mohammad Ali .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 117
[5]   A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran [J].
Arabameri, Alireza ;
Rezaei, Khalil ;
Cerda, Artemi ;
Conoscenti, Christian ;
Kalantari, Zahra .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 660 :443-458
[6]   Incorporating multi-criteria decision-making and fuzzy-value functions for flood susceptibility assessment [J].
Azareh, Ali ;
Sardooi, Elham Rafiei ;
Choubin, Bahram ;
Barkhori, Saeed ;
Shahdadi, Ali ;
Adamowski, Jan ;
Shamshirband, Shahaboddin .
GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 36 (20) :2345-2365
[7]   Spatiotemporal floodplain mapping and prediction using HEC-RAS - GIS tools: Case of the Mejerda river, Tunisia [J].
Ben Khalfallah, C. ;
Saidi, S. .
JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2018, 142 :44-51
[8]   GIS Based Hybrid Computational Approaches for Flash Flood Susceptibility Assessment [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Avand, Mohammadtaghi ;
Janizadeh, Saeid ;
Tran Van Phong ;
Al-Ansari, Nadhir ;
Lanh Si Ho ;
Das, Sumit ;
Hiep Van Le ;
Amini, Ata ;
Bozchaloei, Saeid Khosrobeigi ;
Jafari, Faeze ;
Prakash, Indra .
WATER, 2020, 12 (03)
[9]   A Comparative Study of Kernel Logistic Regression, Radial Basis Function Classifier, Multinomial Naive Bayes, and Logistic Model Tree for Flash Flood Susceptibility Mapping [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Tran Van Phong ;
Huu Duy Nguyen ;
Qi, Chongchong ;
Al-Ansari, Nadhir ;
Amini, Ata ;
Lanh Si Ho ;
Tran Thi Tuyen ;
Hoang Phan Hai Yen ;
Hai-Bang Ly ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Dieu Tien Bui .
WATER, 2020, 12 (01)
[10]   Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Bagging Ensemble Based Alternating Decision Trees, Logistic Regression and J48 Decision Trees Methods: A Comparative Study [J].
Pham B.T. ;
Tien Bui D. ;
Prakash I. .
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2017, 35 (6) :2597-2611