Screening potential social impacts of fossil fuels and biofuels for vehicles

被引:77
作者
Ekener-Petersen, Elisabeth [1 ]
Hoglund, Jonas [2 ]
Finnveden, Goran [1 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn, Div Environm Strategies Res, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] IVL Swedish Environm Res Inst Ltd, Unit Climate & Sustainable Cities, S-10031 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Social impacts; Social life cycle assessment; Vehicle fuels; Biofuels; Fossil fuels; Sustainable transport; OIL; SUSTAINABILITY; RESPONSIBILITY; BIOENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.034
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The generic social and socioeconomic impacts of various biofuels and fossil fuels were screened by applying Social Life Cycle Assessment methodology. Data were taken from the Social Hotspots Database on all categories for all the related themes and all indicators available. To limit the amount of data, only high and very high risk indicators were considered for each combination. The risks identified per life cycle phase were listed for each fuel assessed and the results were then aggregated by counting the number of high and very high risk indicators for that fuel. All the fossil fuels and biofuels analysed were found to display high or very high risks of negative impacts. Country of origin seemed to be of greater importance for risks than fuel type, as the most risk-related and least risk-related product systems referred to the same type of fuel, fossil oil from Russia/Nigeria and fossil oil from Norway, respectively. These results suggest that in developing policy, strict procurement requirements on social performance should be set for both fossil fuel and biofuel. However, the results must be interpreted with care owing to some limitations in the assessment, such as simplifications to life cycles, method used and data collection. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 426
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, JRC SCI TECHNICAL RE
[2]  
[Anonymous], TP080212A
[3]   Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies [J].
Aparcana, Sandra ;
Salhofer, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (05) :1116-1128
[4]   Walls and white elephants: Oil extraction, responsibility, and infrastructural violence in Equatorial Guinea [J].
Appel, Hannah C. .
ETHNOGRAPHY, 2012, 13 (04) :439-465
[5]  
Bauen A., 2010, A causal descriptive approach to modelling the GHG emissions associated with the indirect land use impacts of biofuels
[6]  
Benoit C., 2009, Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and Life Cycle Costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development
[7]   The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! [J].
Benoit, Catherine ;
Norris, Gregory A. ;
Valdivia, Sonia ;
Ciroth, Andreas ;
Moberg, Asa ;
Bos, Ulrike ;
Prakash, Siddharth ;
Ugaya, Cassia ;
Beck, Tabea .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (02) :156-163
[8]   Identifying Social Impacts in Product Supply Chains: Overview and Application of the Social Hotspot Database [J].
Benoit-Norris, Catherine ;
Cavan, Deana Aulisio ;
Norris, Gregory .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (09) :1946-1965
[9]   Bioenergy and land use change-state of the art [J].
Berndes, Goran ;
Ahlgren, Serina ;
Borjesson, Pal ;
Cowie, Annette L. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 2 (03) :282-303
[10]   Biofuels, greenhouse gases and climate change. A review [J].
Bessou, Cecile ;
Ferchaud, Fabien ;
Gabrielle, Benoit ;
Mary, Bruno .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 31 (01) :1-79