Considering sustainability in project management decision making; An investigation using Q-methodology

被引:139
作者
Silvius, A. J. Gilbert [1 ,2 ]
Kampinga, Martin [3 ]
Paniagua, Silvana [4 ]
Mooi, Herman [4 ]
机构
[1] LOI Univ Appl Sci, Leiderdorp, Netherlands
[2] Univ Johannesburg, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
[3] Inholland Univ Appl Sci, Delft, Netherlands
[4] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Project; Project management; Sustainability; Triple constraint; Decision-making; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.011
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Sustainability is one of the most important challenges of our time. Projects play a pivotal role in the realization of more sustainable business practices and the concept of sustainability has also been linked to project management. However, how managers of projects consider sustainability in their operational daily work is still to be explored. This paper uses Q-methodology to investigate the consideration of sustainability aspects in the decision making processes of project managers. The research question was How are dimensions of sustainability considered in the decision making processes of project managers in relation to the triple constraint of time, cost and quality? Based on the Q-sort of selected respondents, the study found that the consideration of sustainability principles is underrepresented, compared to the triple constraint criteria. However, the analysis of the individual Q-sorts revealed four distinct perspectives that differ significantly in their consideration of sustainability principles and triple constraint criteria. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd, APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1150
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   ALIGNING THE EWS METHODOLOGY TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN MANAGEMENT [J].
Barbulescu, Georgeta ;
Medintu, Daniela .
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2011, 3 (01) :77-90
[42]   The effects of Project Management Information Systems on decision making in a multi project environment [J].
Caniels, Marjolein C. J. ;
Bakens, Ralph J. J. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2012, 30 (02) :162-175
[43]   Modeling decision-making reliability of severe accident management: Methodology development using cream [J].
Yoshida, Y ;
Ohtani, M ;
Fujita, Y .
PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, :195-200
[44]   Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment [J].
Zeng, Jiahao ;
An, Min ;
Smith, Nigel John .
International Journal of Project Management, 2007, 25 (06) :589-600
[45]   The role of project management in ineffective decision making within Agile software development projects [J].
McAvoy, John ;
Butler, Tom .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2009, 18 (04) :372-383
[46]   Healthcare Waste Management through Multi-Stage Decision-Making for Sustainability Enhancement [J].
Anjum, Mohd ;
Min, Hong ;
Ahmed, Zubair .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (11)
[47]   Using Certification as a Tool to Develop Sustainability in Project Management [J].
Martinez-Perales, Silvia ;
Ortiz-Marcos, Isabel ;
Juan Ruiz, Jesus ;
Javier Lazaro, Francisco .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (05)
[48]   DECISION PROBLEM ANALYSIS BY USING KT® PROBLEM SOLVING AND DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY [J].
Hruzova, Helena .
6TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2012, :451-459
[49]   Methodology foundations of decision-making concerning balanced management of manufacturing [J].
Khorolskyi, Valentyn ;
Rybalko, Liudmyla ;
Purij, Ganna ;
Khorolska, Olena .
ECONOMIC ANNALS-XXI, 2016, 160 (7-8) :45-50
[50]   Decision Making on Generator for Wind Turbines using the AHP Methodology [J].
de Paiva, Davi F. ;
Santos, Natan ;
Bortoni, Edson C. ;
Yamachita, Roberto A. .
2019 IEEE MILAN POWERTECH, 2019,