Comparative study of the environmental impacts of used cooking oil valorization options in Thailand

被引:13
作者
Thushari, Indika [1 ]
Babel, Sandhya [2 ]
机构
[1] Sri Lanka Technol Campus, Sch Technol, Padukka, Sri Lanka
[2] Sirindhorn Int Inst Technol, Pathum Thani, Thailand
关键词
Used cooking oil; Waste valorization; Energy recovery; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impacts; Circular economy; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; WASTE MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; BIODIESEL PRODUCTION; GREENHOUSE-GAS; ASSESSMENT LCA; FATTY-ACID; FOOD WASTE; EMISSIONS; FUEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114810
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Used cooking oil (UCO) is a valuable resource that can be utilized in different ways. Appropriate management of UCO waste can provide environmental and economic benefits, compared to improper disposal practices. This study assessed the environmental impacts of potential UCO valorization options in Thailand. Altogether, 14 scenarios, including 10 for alternative energy recovering processes (S1-10) and other options such as soap production (S11), use in dry pig feed (DPF) production (S12), synthesis of plastics (S13) and polyol (S14), were considered. The defined system boundaries for each scenario include pretreatment, material and energy consumption, and waste treatment stages for the treatment of 1000 kg UCO. Environmental impacts in terms of global warming potential (GWP), freshwater eutrophication potential (FEP), fossil resource scarcity (FRS), and freshwater, terrestrial, and marine eco-toxicity (FE, TE, and ME, respectively) were analyzed using the ReCiPe Midpoint (H) method. The results revealed that all the current waste valorization options create an environmental burden and contribute towards GWP. Scenarios 7 and 10 showed environmental credits for FEP, FE, and ME indicators while scenario 9 did so for FRS. The processes direct energy consumption resulted in the highest contribution to GWP in Scenarios 1, 5-8, 10, 12, and 13. Environmental effects of material consumption and waste treatments were found to be the highest in bio-oil and DPF production, respectively. However, co-products produced could not offset the burden created by energy and material consumption. Overall, the results showed better environmental performance from energy recovery-based UCO management options compared to alternative processes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Environmental sustainability of cooking fuels in remote communities: Life cycle and local impacts
    Aberilla, Jhud Mikhail
    Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro
    Stamford, Laurence
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 713
  • [2] Life cycle assessment analysis of an ultrasound-assisted system converting waste cooking oil into biodiesel
    Aghbashlo, Mortaza
    Tabatabaei, Meisam
    Amid, Sama
    Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa
    Khoshnevisan, Benyamin
    Kianian, Ghaem
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 151 : 1352 - 1364
  • [3] Environmental Impact Assessment of Food Waste Management Using Two Composting Techniques
    Al-Rumaihi, Aisha
    Mckay, Gordon
    Mackey, Hamish R.
    Al-Ansari, Tareq
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, 14044 ISO
  • [5] Quality and sustainability comparison of one- vs. two-step catalytic hydroprocessing of waste cooking oil
    Bezergianni, Stella
    Dimitriadis, Athanasios
    Chrysikou, Loukia P.
    [J]. FUEL, 2014, 118 : 300 - 307
  • [6] Blom I., 2010, ENV IMPACTS OPERATIO
  • [7] Brunerova A., 2017, Agronomy Research, V15, P359
  • [8] Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modelling of waste management systems
    Clavreul, Julie
    Guyonnet, Dominique
    Christensen, Thomas H.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (12) : 2482 - 2495
  • [9] Curran MA, 2005, J CLEAN PROD, V13, P853, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2002.03.001
  • [10] Dias A., 2014, RECENT ADV ENV SCI B