HYPNOTIZABILITY AND OPINIONS ABOUT HYPNOSIS IN A CLINICAL TRIAL FOR THE HYPNOTIC CONTROL OF PAIN AND ANXIETY DURING PREGNANCY TERMINATION

被引：12

作者：

Dufresne, Alexandra ^{[1
]}

Rainville, Pierre ^{[2
]}

Dodin, Sylvie ^{[1
]}

Barre, Patrick ^{[1
]}

Masse, Benoit ^{[3
]}

Verreault, Rene ^{[1
]}

Marc, Isabelle ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Laval, Quebec City, PQ, Canada

[2] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada

[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPNOSIS | 2010年 / 58卷 / 01期

基金：

加拿大健康研究院;

关键词：

ANALGESIA;

D O I：

10.1080/00207140903310865

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

This descriptive study evaluates the hypnoanalgesic experience's effect on participants' hypnotizability and opinions about hypnosis and identifies factors associated with hypnotizability. Hypnotizability was assessed using the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form A in 290 women 1 month after their participation in a randomized clinical trial evaluating hypnotic intervention for pain/anxiety versus standard care during pregnancy termination. Opinions were collected before and after the intervention. The regression model describing hypnotizability (F = 13.55; p < .0001; R-2 = 0.20) retained 5 variables but not the intervention group. The variable explaining most of total variance (62.9%) was the level of perceived automaticity/involuntariness. Opinions about hypnosis were modified by the hypnotic experience compared to standard care but were not associated with hypnotizability. Exposure to hypnoanalgesia did not influence hypnotizability but modifies significantly the opinions about hypnosis. Consistent with previous findings, perceived automaticity appears to best predict hypnotizability.

引用

页码：82 / 101

页数：20

共 31 条

[21] A meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia:: How effective is hypnosis? [J].