Higher breast cancer conspicuity on dbPET compared to WB-PET/CT

被引:37
作者
Nishimatsu, Kayo [1 ]
Nakamoto, Yuji [1 ]
Miyake, Kanae K. [1 ]
Ishimori, Takayoshi [1 ]
Kanao, Shotaro [1 ]
Toi, Masakazu [2 ]
Togashi, Kaori [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Nucl Med, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Breast Surg, Kyoto, Japan
关键词
Breast cancer; Positron-emission tomography (PET); Dedicated breast PET scanner; PET/CT; POSITRON EMISSION MAMMOGRAPHY; F-18; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE; FDG PET; TOMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; LESIONS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.046
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate lesion detectability of a dedicated breast positron-emission tomography (dbPET) scanner for breast cancers with an updated reconstruction mode, comparing it to whole-body positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (WB-PET/CT). Materials and methods: A total of 179 histologically-proven breast cancer lesions in 150 females who underwent both WB-PET/CT and dbPET with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose were retrospectively analyzed. The patient/breast/lesion-based sensitivities based on visual analysis were compared between dbPET and WB-PET/CT. For lesions visible on both PET images, SUVmax values of the tumors were measured, and tumor-to-background ratios (T/B ratios) of SUVmax were compared between the two scans. Subgroup analyses according to clinical tumor stage, histopathology and histological grade were also performed. Results: Patient/breast/lesion-based sensitivities were 95%, 95%, and 92%, respectively, for dbPET, and 95%, 94%, and 88%, respectively, for WB-PET/CT. Mean +/- standard deviation SUVmax values of FDG-avid tumors were 13.0 +/- 9.7 on dbPET and 6.4 +/- 4.8 on WB-PET. T/B ratios were also significantly higher in dbPET than in WB-PET/CT (8.1 +/- 7.1 vs. 5.1 +/- 4.5). In the subgroup analysis, no significant differences in sensitivities between dbPET and WB-PET/CT were found. However, T/B ratios of dbPET were significantly higher than those of WB-PET/CT in cT1c, cT2, cT3, invasive cancer, invasive carcinoma of no special type, mucinous carcinoma and Grades 1-3. Conclusion: No significant differences in sensitivities were identified between dbPET using an updated reconstruction mode and WB-PET/CT; however, T/B ratios of dbPET were significantly higher than those of WB-PET/CT, indicating higher tumor conspicuity on dbPET. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 145
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]  
Tanaka E., PHYS MED BIOL
[22]  
Vranjesevic D, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P1238
[23]   From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors [J].
Wahl, Richard L. ;
Jacene, Heather ;
Kasamon, Yvette ;
Lodge, Martin A. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 :122S-150S
[24]  
Yamakawa Y, 2011, IEEE NUCL SCI CONF R, P3130, DOI 10.1109/NSSMIC.2011.6152569
[25]  
Yamamoto Y., CLIN NUCL MED