Is current eye-care-policy focus almost exclusively on cataract adequate to deal with blindness in India?

被引:119
作者
Dandona, L
Dandona, R
Naduvilath, TJ
McCarty, CA
Nanda, A
Srinivas, M
Mandal, P
Rao, GN
机构
[1] LV Prasad Eye Inst, Publ Hlth Ophthalmol Serv, Hyderabad 500034, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Ophthalmol, Epidemiol Res Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09509-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background India's National Programme for Control of Blindness focuses almost exclusively on cataract, based on a national survey done in the 1980s which reported that cataract caused 80% of the blindness in India, No current population-based data on the causes of blindness in India are available, We assessed the rate and causes of blindness in an urban population in southern India. Methods We selected 2954 participants by stratified, random, cluster, systematic sampling from Hyderabad city. Eligible participants were interviewed and given a detailed ocular assessment, including visual acuity, refraction, slitlamp biomicroscopy, applanation intraocular pressure, gonioscopy, dilatation, grading of cataract, stereoscopic fundus assessment, and automated-threshold visual fields. Findings 2522 participants, including 1399 aged 30 years or more, were assessed. 49 participants tall aged greater than or equal to 30 years) were blind (presenting distance visual acuity <6/60 or central visual field <20 degrees in the better eye). The rate of blindness among those aged 30 years or more, adjusted for age and sex, was 3.08% ([95% CI 1.95-4.21]), Causes included cataract (29.7%), retinal disease (17.1%), corneal disease (15.4%), refractive error (12.5%), glaucoma (12.1%), and optic atrophy (11.0%). 15.7% of the blindness caused by visual-field constriction would have been missed without visual-field examination. Also without visual-field and detailed dilated-fundus assessments, blindness attributed to cataract would have been overestimated by up to 75.8%. If the use of cataract surgery in this urban population was half that found in this study, which simulates the situation in rural India, cataract would have caused 51.8% (39.4-64.2) of blindness, significantly less than the 80% accepted by current policy. Interpretation Much of the blindness in this Indian population was due to non-cataract causes. The previous national survey did not include detailed dilated-fundus assessment and visual-field examination which could have led to overestimation of cataract as a cause of blindness in India. Policy-makers in India should encourage well-designed population-based epidemiological studies from which to develop a comprehensive long-term policy on blindness in addition to dealing with cataract.
引用
收藏
页码:1312 / 1316
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Attebo K, 1996, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V103, P357
  • [2] BENNETT S, 1991, World Health Statistics Quarterly, V44, P98
  • [3] THE LENS OPACITIES CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM-III
    CHYLACK, LT
    WOLFE, JK
    SINGER, DM
    LESKE, MC
    BULLIMORE, MA
    BAILEY, IL
    FRIEND, J
    MCCARTHY, D
    WU, SY
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 111 (06) : 831 - 836
  • [4] *DAN ASS NAT PROGR, 1997, RAP ASS CAT BLINDN P, P10
  • [5] Population-based assessment of childhood blindness in southern India
    Dandona, L
    Williams, JD
    Williams, BC
    Rao, GN
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 116 (04) : 545 - 546
  • [6] Dandona Lalit, 1998, Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, V46, P93
  • [7] Dandona Rakhi, 1997, Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, V45, P251
  • [8] NEW VISUAL-ACUITY CHARTS FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH
    FERRIS, FL
    KASSOFF, A
    BRESNICK, GH
    BAILEY, I
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1982, 94 (01) : 91 - 96
  • [9] *GOV IND DIR GEN H, 1993, PRES STAT NAT PROGR
  • [10] *HUMPHR INSTR INC, 1974, HUMPHR FIELD AN 2 US