Using risk communication to disclose the outcome of a participatory decision-making process: Effects on the perceived acceptability of risk-policy decision

被引:71
作者
Arvai, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Nat Resources, Environm Commun Anal & Res Policy Working Grp, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1539-6924.00308
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
It has been suggested that public participation during decision making about risks can lead to more widely accepted risk policies. This article discusses an experiment to determine if this is true when people are made aware of the fact that a participatory decision-making process has taken place only through information disclosed during a subsequent risk communication effort. The results from this experiment showed that, after receiving information during risk communication that cast risk policies about space exploration as the product of a participatory decision process, participants in the study felt more supportive of the resulting decisions than did participants in a control group. This result coincided with the participants in the study group perceiving the risks associated with the decision to be lower and the benefits higher. Responses from these participants also showed that they were more satisfied with the decision-making process than they were with the outcome of the decision itself. Therefore, it may be premature to view the objective of participatory decision-making approaches-and the risk communication efforts that discuss them-as a means of making risk policies more widely acceptable to the public at large. Rather, it may be better to view the benefits of these approaches in terms of their ability to help lead to higher quality decisions that are the product of more widely accepted decision processes.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 289
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A PSYCHOLOGICAL-STUDY OF THE INVERSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED RISK AND PERCEIVED BENEFIT [J].
ALHAKAMI, AS ;
SLOVIC, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) :1085-1096
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, IMPR RISK COMM
[3]  
[Anonymous], RISK HLTH SAFETY ENV
[4]   Testing a structured decision approach: Value-focused thinking for deliberative risk communication [J].
Arvai, JL ;
Gregory, R ;
McDaniels, TL .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2001, 21 (06) :1065-1076
[5]   Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works? [J].
Chess, C ;
Purcell, K .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (16) :2685-2692
[6]  
*GALL ORG, 1999, DESP REC HIGH VIS AM
[7]   Using stakeholder values to make smarter environmental decisions [J].
Gregory, R .
ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 42 (05) :34-44
[8]  
GREGORY R, 2001, ENV RISKS PERCEPTION, V9, P249
[10]   Beyond confused noise: Ideas toward communicative procedural justice [J].
Hillier, J .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 1998, 18 (01) :14-24