Thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin in medical patients: which patients benefit?

被引:46
作者
Cohen, Alexander T.
Turpie, Alexander G. G.
Leizorovicz, Alain
Olsson, Carl-Gustav
Vaitkus, Paul T.
Goldhaber, Samuel Z.
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, Dept Surg, London SE5 9PJ, England
[2] Hamilton Hlth Sci Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Lyon 1, Clin Pharmacol Unit, F-69365 Lyon, France
[4] Univ Sjukhuset, Verksamhetsomrade Akutsjukvard, Lund, Sweden
[5] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Div Cardiol, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
anticoagulants; dalteparin; deep vein thrombosis; low-molecular-weight heparin; thromboembolism;
D O I
10.1177/1358863x07079017
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
It is unclear whether thromboprophylaxis produces a consistent risk reduction in different subgroups of medical patients at risk from venous thromboembolism. We performed a retrospective, post hoc analysis of 3706 patients enrolled in the PREVENT study. Patients were at least 40 years old with an acute medical condition requiring hospitalization for at least 4 days and had no more than 3 days of immobilization prior to enrolment. Patients received either subcutaneous dalteparin (5000 IU) or placebo once daily. The primary end point was the composite of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, asymptomatic proximal DVT or sudden death. Primary diagnosis subgroups were acute congestive heart failure, acute respiratory failure, infectious disease, rheumatological disorders, or inflammatory bowel disease. All patients, except those with congestive heart or respiratory failure, had at least one additional risk factor for venous thromboembolism. A risk reduction was shown in patients receiving dalteparin versus placebo. The relative risk (RR) was 0.73 in patients with congestive heart failure, 0.72 for respiratory failure, 0.46 for infectious disease, and 0.97 for rheumatological disorders. The RR was 0.52 in patients aged >= 75 years, 0.64 in obese patients, 0.34 for patients with varicose veins, and 0.71 in patients with chronic heart failure. No subgroup had a significantly different response from any other. Importantly, multivariate analysis showed that all patient groups benefited from thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin. Our findings, therefore, support the broad application of thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 127
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical patients with enoxaparin: a subgroup analysis of the MEDENOX study [J].
Alikhan, R ;
Cohen, AT ;
Combe, S ;
Samama, MM ;
Desjardins, L ;
Eldor, A ;
Janbon, C ;
Leizorovicz, A ;
Olsson, CG ;
Turpie, AGG .
BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 2003, 14 (04) :341-346
[2]  
BECKER N, 2003, ARCH INTERN MED, V102, P1165
[3]   PREVENTION OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS IN MEDICAL PATIENTS BY LOW-DOSE HEPARIN [J].
BELCH, JJ ;
LOWE, GDO ;
WARD, AG ;
FORBES, CD ;
PRENTICE, CRM .
SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1981, 26 (02) :115-117
[4]   HIGH-RISK OF THE CRITICALLY ILL FOR VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM [J].
CADE, JF .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1982, 10 (07) :448-450
[5]  
Cohen AT, 1996, HAEMOSTASIS, V26, P65
[6]   Discoveries in thrombosis care for medical patients [J].
Cohen, AT .
SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2002, 28 :13-17
[7]   Pulmonary embolism: What have we learned since Virchow? - Natural history, pathophysiology, and diagnosis [J].
Dalen, JE .
CHEST, 2002, 122 (04) :1440-1456
[8]   Prevention of venous thromboembolism [J].
Geerts, WH ;
Pineo, GF ;
Heit, JA ;
Bergqvist, D ;
Lassen, MR ;
Colwell, CW ;
Ray, JG .
CHEST, 2004, 126 (03) :338S-400S
[9]   Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER) [J].
Goldhaber, SZ ;
Visani, L ;
De Rosa, M .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9162) :1386-1389
[10]   A prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis [J].
Goldhaber, SZ ;
Tapson, VF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 93 (02) :259-262