DIAGNOSTIC SELF-TESTING: AUTONOMOUS CHOICES AND RELATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES

被引:17
作者
Kearns, Alan J. [1 ,2 ]
O'Mathuna, Donal P. [1 ]
Scott, P. Anne
机构
[1] Dublin City Univ, Sch Nursing, Dublin 9, Ireland
[2] Mater Dei Inst Educ, Dublin, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
diagnosis; self-testing; autonomy; relational responsibility; person; accuracy; personal significance; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; KITS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00711.x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Diagnostic self-testing devices are being developed for many illnesses, chronic diseases and infections. These will be used in hospitals, at point-of-care facilities and at home. Designed to allow earlier detection of diseases, self-testing diagnostic devices may improve disease prevention, slow the progression of disease and facilitate better treatment outcomes. These devices have the potential to benefit both the individual and society by enabling individuals to take a more proactive role in the maintenance of their health and by helping society improve health and reduce health costs. However, the full implications of future home-based diagnostic technology for individuals and society remain unclear due to their novelty. We argue that the development of diagnostic tools, especially for home use, will heighten a number of ethical challenges. This paper will explore some of the ethical implications of home-based self-testing diagnostic devices for the autonomous and relational dimensions of the person. This will be facilitated by examining the impact of diagnostic devices for individual autonomy, for the delivery of accurate diagnosis and for the personal significance of the information for the user. The latter will be examined using Charles Taylor's view of personhood and his emphasis on human agency and interpretation. While the ethical issues are not necessarily new, the development of home-based self-testing diagnostic devices will make issues regarding autonomy, accuracy of information and personal significance more and more demanding. This will be the case particularly when an individual's autonomous choices come into conflict with the person's relational responsibilities.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 207
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   The right not to know: an autonomy based approach [J].
Andorno, R .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2004, 30 (05) :435-439
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1985, HUMAN AGENCY LANGUAG
[3]   PATIENT PARTICIPATION - ITS MEANING AND SIGNIFICANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF CARING [J].
ASHWORTH, PD ;
LONGMATE, MA ;
MORRISON, P .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1992, 17 (12) :1430-1439
[4]   Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework [J].
Atkinson, AJ ;
Colburn, WA ;
DeGruttola, VG ;
DeMets, DL ;
Downing, GJ ;
Hoth, DF ;
Oates, JA ;
Peck, CC ;
Schooley, RT ;
Spilker, BA ;
Woodcock, J ;
Zeger, SL .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 69 (03) :89-95
[5]   Diagnostic efficiency of home pregnancy test kits - A meta-analysis [J].
Bastian, LA ;
Nanda, K ;
Hasselblad, V ;
Simel, DL .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1998, 7 (05) :465-469
[6]   The failure of theories of personhood [J].
Beauchamp, TL .
KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL, 1999, 9 (04) :309-324
[7]  
*BIOM DIAGN I, 2006, BACKGR
[8]   Responsibility in health care: a liberal egalitarian approach [J].
Cappelen, AW ;
Norheim, OF .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2005, 31 (08) :476-480
[9]  
Chadwick R, 1997, RIGHT KNOW RIGHT NOT, P13
[10]  
DANDERSON D, 2006, TIMESONLINE