Development of a new quantitative structure-activity relationship model for predicting Ames mutagenicity of food flavor chemicals using StarDrop™ auto-Modeller™

被引:9
|
作者
Kasamatsu, Toshio [1 ]
Kitazawa, Airi [1 ]
Tajima, Sumie [2 ]
Kaneko, Masahiro [2 ]
Sugiyama, Kei-ichi [1 ]
Yamada, Masami [1 ,3 ]
Yasui, Manabu [1 ]
Masumura, Kenichi [1 ]
Horibata, Katsuyoshi [1 ]
Honma, Masamitsu [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Hlth Sci, Div Genet & Mutagenesis, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] HULINKS Inc, Chuo City, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Natl Def Acad, Dept Appl Chem, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
[4] Natl Inst Hlth Sci, Div Gen Affairs, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR); Food flavors; Mutagenicity Ames test; StarDrop (TM) auto-Modeller (TM); Machine learning; SUBSTANCES;
D O I
10.1186/s41021-021-00182-6
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background Food flavors are relatively low molecular weight chemicals with unique odor-related functional groups that may also be associated with mutagenicity. These chemicals are often difficult to test for mutagenicity by the Ames test because of their low production and peculiar odor. Therefore, application of the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) approach is being considered. We used the StarDrop (TM) Auto-Modeller (TM) to develop a new QSAR model. Results In the first step, we developed a new robust Ames database of 406 food flavor chemicals consisting of existing Ames flavor chemical data and newly acquired Ames test data. Ames results for some existing flavor chemicals have been revised by expert reviews. We also collected 428 Ames test datasets for industrial chemicals from other databases that are structurally similar to flavor chemicals. A total of 834 chemicals' Ames test datasets were used to develop the new QSAR models. We repeated the development and verification of prototypes by selecting appropriate modeling methods and descriptors and developed a local QSAR model. A new QSAR model "StarDrop NIHS 834_67" showed excellent performance (sensitivity: 79.5%, specificity: 96.4%, accuracy: 94.6%) for predicting Ames mutagenicity of 406 food flavors and was better than other commercial QSAR tools. Conclusions A local QSAR model, StarDrop NIHS 834_67, was customized to predict the Ames mutagenicity of food flavor chemicals and other low molecular weight chemicals. The model can be used to assess the mutagenicity of food flavors without actual testing.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a new quantitative structure–activity relationship model for predicting Ames mutagenicity of food flavor chemicals using StarDrop™ auto-Modeller™
    Toshio Kasamatsu
    Airi Kitazawa
    Sumie Tajima
    Masahiro Kaneko
    Kei-ichi Sugiyama
    Masami Yamada
    Manabu Yasui
    Kenichi Masumura
    Katsuyoshi Horibata
    Masamitsu Honma
    Genes and Environment, 43
  • [2] Screening for Ames mutagenicity of food flavor chemicals by (quantitative) structure-activity relationship
    Honma, Masamitsu
    Kitazawa, Airi
    Kasamatsu, Toshio
    Sugiyama, Kei-ichi
    GENES AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 42 (01)
  • [3] Screening for Ames mutagenicity of food flavor chemicals by (quantitative) structure-activity relationship
    Masamitsu Honma
    Airi Kitazawa
    Toshio Kasamatsu
    Kei-ichi Sugiyama
    Genes and Environment, 42
  • [4] Improvement of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project
    Honma, Masamitsu
    Kitazawa, Airi
    Cayley, Alex
    Williams, Richard V.
    Barber, Chris
    Hanser, Thierry
    Saiakhov, Roustem
    Chakravarti, Suman
    Myatt, Glenn J.
    Cross, Kevin P.
    Benfenati, Emilio
    Raitano, Giuseppa
    Mekenyan, Ovanes
    Petkov, Petko
    Bossa, Cecilia
    Benigni, Romualdo
    Battistelli, Chiara Laura
    Giuliani, Alessandro
    Tcheremenskaia, Olga
    DeMeo, Christine
    Norinder, Ulf
    Koga, Hiromi
    Jose, Ciloy
    Jeliazkova, Nina
    Kochev, Nikolay
    Paskaleva, Vesselina
    Yang, Chihae
    Daga, Pankaj R.
    Clark, Robert D.
    Rathman, James
    MUTAGENESIS, 2019, 34 (01) : 3 - 16
  • [5] New Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models Improve Predictability of Ames Mutagenicity for Aromatic Azo Compounds
    Manganelli, Serena
    Benfenati, Emilio
    Manganaro, Alberto
    Kulkarni, Sunil
    Barton-Maclaren, Tara S.
    Honma, Masamitsu
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 153 (02) : 316 - 326
  • [6] Predicting oxidative stress induced by organic chemicals by using quantitative Structure-Activity relationship methods
    Zhang, Shengnan
    Khan, Waqas Amin
    Su, Limin
    Zhang, Xuehua
    Li, Chao
    Qin, Weichao
    Zhao, Yuanhui
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2020, 201
  • [7] DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP RULES FOR PREDICTING CARCINOGENIC POTENTIAL OF CHEMICALS
    WOO, YT
    LAI, DY
    ARGUS, MF
    ARCOS, JC
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1995, 79 (1-3) : 219 - 228
  • [8] Screening of 397 chemicals and development of a quantitative structure-activity relationship model for androgen receptor antagonism
    Vinggaard, Anne Marie
    Niemela, Jay
    Wedebye, Eva Bay
    Jensen, Gunde Egeskov
    CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2008, 21 (04) : 813 - 823
  • [9] A QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP FOR PREDICTING METABOLIC BIOTRANSFORMATION RATES FOR ORGANIC CHEMICALS IN FISH
    Arnot, Jon A.
    Meylan, William
    Tunkel, Jay
    Howard, Phil H.
    Mackay, Don
    Bonnell, Mark
    Boethling, Robert S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2009, 28 (06) : 1168 - 1177
  • [10] Predicting P-glycoprotein substrates by a quantitative structure-activity relationship model
    Gombar, VK
    Polli, JW
    Humphreys, JE
    Wring, SA
    Serabjit-Singh, CS
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 93 (04) : 957 - 968